Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TigerLikesRooster

I thought the containment vessels were designed for this sort of event (meltdown).


5 posted on 05/25/2011 7:59:39 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Paladin2

The 2 events surpassed the design parameters of the plant.

The containment vessel/building is 3rd part of a reactor’s defense in depth. The first is the fuel rod cladding, then the reactor pressure vessel, then the containment building.

It is the reactor pressure vessel’s integrity that would be of most concern as it holds the fuel rods, which have melted to varying degrees.


9 posted on 05/25/2011 8:30:33 AM PDT by fred2008
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Paladin2

“I thought the containment vessels were designed for this sort of event (meltdown).”

Nope. A containment vessel is meant to contain the situation if the pressure vessel is compromised, say, if the melted fuel rods puddle in the bottom of the pressure vessel and then melt on through that. Not good if the containment vessel has been breached, because the next thing after that is dirt.


14 posted on 05/25/2011 10:58:50 AM PDT by catnipman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson