Not exactly. I heard him on several interviews during the time of the Coleman-Franken recounts. He definitely indicated his support for Coleman, but apparently he couldn't do anything about the 'Rat Secretary of State and the 'Rat controlled Minnesota court that determined the outcome. It is said by some that Coleman was the victim of poor lawyering, but he had the cards stacked against him because the people determining the outcome knew who they wanted to win and allowed enough fraud to push Franken over the top. Pawlenty had no legal authority to intervene.
And mentioned that on FR threads, and no one disputed it.
I would think that a governor of a state would have some authority over fraud, especially if an official like Sec of State was overseeing it. And when it was so obvious.
Oh well.