Well, I like to make up my own mind. I have even listened to Alex a couple of times. It was crap, but I enjoyed the conversations. If it's crap, it won't stand up. Having a BC saying he was born in Hawaii is different than the Constitutional requirements. I never really doubted he was born in Hawaii, but he readily admitted his father was Kenyan. NO one is discussing what change in the Constitution allows an anchor baby to become president. This will come up again, IMHO, because we will have an anchor baby, that can't speak English, that burns the US flag, that will make his platform to give back the "stolen" lands, run for office in the near future. Whether he comes from Tuscon or LA won't make a difference, but he shouldn't even be allowed on a ballot. The Corsi book discusses many more topics than just a BC. He should be taken seriously by the media, but now, I don't see him getting a break. I'm sure Infowars wasn't his first choice.
There are many that might say discussions here on FR are crap, but discuss, we do. The intellectual exchange will soon show who hasn't done their homework. I still learn from people that don't know what they are talking about. Just like Edison, I learn what doesn't work. If there is something hidden somewhere that says the requirement of both parents to be citizens has changed, I'm all ears. I don't pretend to know every legal nuance that has been discussed in the past. All I know is that this very topic has been discussed at leased 4 times on the SCOTUS and they all found the 2 parent rule intact. Just because it hasn't been for POTUS doesn't mean we can't have a definition for Nat Born Citizen.