Posted on 05/18/2011 5:19:05 PM PDT by jocon307
The pro-life cause is winning. In state legislatures, in the media, and in grassroots efforts to reduce the number of abortions, pro-life activists have put abortion rights advocates on defense. The pro-life movement certainly has hurdles to overcome before the United States can become a place where all human life is legally protected. Yet the eventual outcome is certain. Here are five reasons I believe we have reached a tipping point in favor of the pro-life cause.
(Excerpt) Read more at patheos.com ...
I think the most encouraging point in there is actually the media one: the author ends with the observation that media is NOT leading the way, but catching up to what we-as-a-society see/believe.
It’s also interesting to see the surge of popularity in comic-book movies; I think this has more to do with the average citizen WANTING strong people to stand for Truth, Justice, and... The American Way.
I’ve noticed that young people are very pro life as well. That’s a very encouraging trend.
Ping
“The pro-aborts keep thinning their own ranks.”
Yes, they do do that.
“I think the most encouraging point in there is actually the media one”
Yes, I liked that he remembered that infamous old Maude episode.
I remember thinking “we’re winning” when Juno won the academy award (for best orginal screenplay, yes? it didn’t win best picture did it? I don’t think so.) I really almost fell on the floor when that happened.
That was a very good movie, totally pro-life, pro-adoption. And the pro-life protester friend of Juno, that was such a sweet portrayal. She was just a bit geeky, but determined. Of course, I have a real soft spot for the lone protester, even if I totally disagree with their views. The author of the piece actually remembers a more lyrical line than I do, I just remember the line “I’m staying pregnant”.
And there are sooooo many tv commercials that have the sonogram fetuses in them now, like it or not THAT is the stuff that really educates people.
God bless the pro-life movement for not giving up, all these years, may the struggles and the successes continue.
(Please excuse all misspellings in this post, I feel like they are legion and I’m just too lazy to check!)
Gosh. Posts like this make me want to join the FR blog-haters club. Not only did you excerpt to get us to go to the site, but when you go there they pull a Horowitz and make you click through multiple pages to read a story that they could just as easily have posted on the first page. There can be only one reason for that, which is to get multiple clicks so they can pull in ad revenue.
Oh well, from what I can read here I can tell that the writer doesn’t have much of a clue whether we’re actually “winning” or “losing,” or why.
Oh well, from what I can read here I can tell that the writer doesn’t have much of a clue whether we’re actually “winning” or “losing,” or why.
The article explains it pretty good. You need to read the whole article.
I don't see that it is a blog site. It looks like a web site to me. I copy and pasted it all together for you.
This is all very good news.
Evangelical Portal
Five Signs the Pro-Life Cause Is Winning
Interpreting polls and laws and cultural trends, the author finds five reasons to believe that we have reached a tipping point on the abortion issue.
By Trevin Wax, May 16, 2011
Editor's Note: The article below is published as a part of a symposium hosted by Patheos' Catholic Portal and Evangelical Portal, entitled, "For Life and Family: Faith and the Future of Social Conservatism."
The pro-life cause is winning. In state legislatures, in the media, and in grassroots efforts to reduce the number of abortions, pro-life activists have put abortion rights advocates on defense. The pro-life movement certainly has hurdles to overcome before the United States can become a place where all human life is legally protected. Yet the eventual outcome is certain. Here are five reasons I believe we have reached a tipping point in favor of the pro-life cause.
1) Public Opinion
A majority of Americans surveyed in a recent Rasmussen poll, including a large percentage of those who identified themselves "pro-choice," said they believe abortion is "morally wrong most of the time." Last year, for the third consecutive time, Gallup found that more Americans accept the pro-life label, a result that led the polling firm to acknowledge "a real change in public opinion."
One reason for this shift is the high-tech ultrasound machine that reaffirms what embryology textbooks have told us all along -- that the unborn child is truly a human being. In a recent Washington Post editorial, Frances Kissling, former President of Catholics for Choice, advised abortion-rights advocates to shift strategies: "We can no longer pretend the fetus is invisible." Yet few pro-choice activists seem to be listening to Kissling's advice. They continue to cast themselves as the defenders of "women's reproductive rights." This worn-out strategy fails to resonate with a large number of Americans because it ignores the point of tension. The debate has moved on from "reproductive rights" to the more perplexing question: "What are the unborn?"
Meanwhile, many people -- including some you would not expect -- are openly registering their unease with the procedure. Take the recently released autobiography of Steven Tyler, the "screamin' demon" lead singer of rock band Aerosmith. When he impregnated a teenaged girl in the mid-1970s, friends convinced them they could not raise the child and should seek an abortion. "They put the needle in her belly and squeeze the stuff in and you watch," Tyler recounted. "And it comes out dead. I was pretty devastated. In my mind, I'm going, Jesus, what have I done?"
Twenty years ago, many of those who considered themselves "pro-life" were a little hesitant to say so publicly. Today, the reverse is true. Even those who advocate a woman's right to abortion don't want to fight for that position too passionately.
2) The Media
In 1972, an episode of Maude concluded with the central character choosing to have an abortion. One would think that nearly forty years later, we would be past this debate. Not so. In fact, filmmakers and television writers have discovered that fictional abortion not only kills a fetus, but kills a story as well. Movie and television characters who wrestle with the decision (Dr. Abby Lockhart on ER, for example) almost always choose life.
That's why even pro-choice filmmakers choose life in the end. Juno is a good example. The pregnant teenage girl approaches an abortion clinic and meets a pro-life friend who informs her that the baby has a heartbeat, can feel pain, and already has fingernails. Juno chooses "to appreciate her miracle."
Similarly, in a 2009 episode of Law and Order ("Dignity"), a female attorney seeking justice for a murdered abortion doctor is shaken by a description of partial-birth abortion. "I grew up thinking Roe v. Wade was gospel," she says. Now, "I don't know where my freedom ends and the dignity of another being begins."
The media is not leading the way when it comes to the pro-life cause. It's only catching up to the sweeping pro-life sentiments of the majority of Americans. Yet the shift in popular culture reflects the progress the pro-life argument has made.
3) Young People
Sixteen-year-old singing sensation, Justin Bieber, was recently asked by Rolling Stone for his position on abortion: "I really don't believe in abortion," he said, since abortion is "like killing a baby." Bieber is not alone. The sea of young faces at this year's annual "March for Life" in Washington prompted NARAL (National Abortion Rights Action League) President Nancy Keenan to worry: "There are so many of them, and they are so young."
Bieber, ironically enough, was castigated by Barbara Walters for answering questions inappropriate for a person of his age -- even though girls can actually receive abortions, and not merely opine on them, at ages younger than 16. That a veteran journalist like Walters fails to see the inconsistency in her position is a testament to how entrenched are the ideas among the older generation of abortion advocates.
4) The Third Wave
John Ensor of Heartbeat International writes: "In the first wave, Catholics took the lead is declaring the inherent evil of abortion. Evangelicals then flooded in to help advance the pregnancy help movement. The Third Wave points to the victory of our movement and the downfall of abortion as a business, when Black and Hispanic Christians not only join this movement, but lead it."
A few months ago, a billboard in New York City featured a picture of an African-American girl with the message "The most dangerous place for an African-American is in the womb." Many found the ad "racist" and thought it condemned black women for having abortions. Lost in the controversy was the actual point of the advertisement: abortion clinics target poor minorities in the inner city. Although the billboard was taken down, it pointed to the troubling racial history of abortion. When YouTube videos began making the rounds, showing the overtly racist agenda of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, some pro-choice advocates were forced to reconsider their assumptions.
5) Abortion Advocates on the Defensive
While Roe still stands, legislators in numerous states have begun chipping away at the implications of that decision. Supporting their efforts is increasing evidence of corruption at abortion clinics.
Planned Parenthood's advocates have sought to redirect the discussion by pointing to all the other health care services their clinics provide for low-income women. But implicit in Planned Parenthood's downplaying of abortion and emphasizing of other services is a stunning admission: abortion is a problem. Planned Parenthood's talking points indicate that fewer and fewer Americans can stomach the idea of "abortion as health care."
And then there is the admission that abortion is a "tragic choice." On a recent episode of The View, Whoopi Goldberg explained her reason for being pro-choice: the low-income woman who already has too many children. When confronted about women who simply get abortions out of convenience, she called them "idiots." Why does Whoopi have such a visceral reaction to abortion-for-convenience? Because she's an inconsistent advocate of abortion rights: she recognizes that the fetus is a human being and that abortion snuffs out this life. The fact that she (and others like her) sees abortion as a "tragic choice" implicitly speaks to the immorality of the procedure.
Conclusion
The tipping point in favor of the pro-life cause is not evident to all. Time magazine recently chose Planned Parenthood president Cecile Richards for their 100 Most Influential List (a decision akin to choosing segregationist George Wallace over crusader Martin Luther King, Jr.). There is much work to be done.
The abortion debate will not go away. The fundamental issue at stake is not reproductive freedom but the desire to extend human rights to all -- even the smallest and most vulnerable human beings among us. Those who continue to ignore or deny the humanity of the unborn are increasingly on the defensive because new technologies are opening the window into the womb. What we find there are not tissues to be discarded, but human lives worth protecting.
The idea that legislators are “chipping away” at abortion is a fallacy and a deception. Actually what they are doing is codifying child killing.
Sorry EV, THANKS Kimber!
I just didn’t post the whole thing, it seemed long and clearly I am lazier than Kimber!
Plus, the link takes you right to the piece, how they lay it out over whatever amount of pages, I can’t do anything about that.
Although, I must say I find the weekly standard site weird, their “page” lengths can be very inconsistent at times.
Patheos is some kind of religious site, but I am not that familiar with it. I see links to it a lot at hot air, but this came via first things. Those are rather far points of reference on this whole RIGHT LINE we got going on, so I thought that was interesting.
Thanks again Kimber for improving this thread!
Another one is the 4-D sonograms or prenatal baby photos. People thought it was weird that we showed off “baby photos” of our daughter at 20 weeks along. Feminist coworkers commented how it wasn’t a baby yet, or even if I was failing socially to have a baby so young (mid-20s).
I remarked that as a college graduate married for several years, my husband and I were established enough to have children, and how was I violating female liberation by choosing to have a child when it was our ideal biological time - and I was at work, wasn’t I?
bttt
“...and I was at work, wasn’t I?”
LOL, that sounds like what I would say! I’d advise you against working so hard, but it would probably be pointless, and I wouldn’t believe it myself.
The article is about the best written I have seen on the cultural evolution of the subject. It is not smug or triumphal. It presents the developments calmly and makes no accusations.
Thanks arthurus!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.