Skip to comments.
Documents Raise Questions about Supreme Court Justice Kagan’s Role in Obamacare Defense as...
Judicial Watch ^
| May 18, 2011
Posted on 05/18/2011 10:26:02 AM PDT by jazusamo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
Obama's DOJ is up to their necks in this refusing to release info, as usual.
1
posted on
05/18/2011 10:26:09 AM PDT
by
jazusamo
To: jazusamo
Can the other judges on the Supreme Court force her to recuse herself? Can anyone? Can a Republican majority Congress impeach her?
To: jazusamo
This evidence is very, very close, but no cigar, without a direct tie to Kagan’s keyboard. However, it certainly fills the bill for “reasonable question” enough to impose recusal. The AG holds the stinger and won’t let go.
3
posted on
05/18/2011 10:33:09 AM PDT
by
RitaOK
To: KansasGirl
I believe but am not certain that a justice has to recuse themselves. A justice can be impeached but that's very doubtful I'd guess.
4
posted on
05/18/2011 10:34:10 AM PDT
by
jazusamo
(His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
To: KansasGirl
Justices are impeachable is all I know. The process surely is similar to the other two branches of government’t but haven’t a clue on the exact process.
5
posted on
05/18/2011 10:37:18 AM PDT
by
RitaOK
To: KansasGirl
Justices are impeachable is all I know. The process surely is similar to the other two branches of government’t but haven’t a clue on the exact process.
6
posted on
05/18/2011 10:37:18 AM PDT
by
RitaOK
To: jazusamo
0bama, Kagan, Holder, Geithner, and all the rest of them can do whatever they want, as long as everyone’s too gutless to stand up to them.
Which has already been demonstrated many times.
7
posted on
05/18/2011 10:40:17 AM PDT
by
668 - Neighbor of the Beast
(America is in dire distress and nobody is lifting a finger except to strike the keyboard.)
To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...
8
posted on
05/18/2011 10:50:05 AM PDT
by
Nachum
(The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
To: jazusamo
So?
Calypso Wireless is pursuing a case against an alleged bad actor who wants to appropriate for himself the company's invaluable key patent. The judge is alleged to be a buddy of the defendant's lawyer. Judge has refused to remove himself from the trial. Apparently, conflicts of interest are dismissed out of hand.
9
posted on
05/18/2011 10:52:18 AM PDT
by
pabianice
To: KansasGirl
Can a Republican majority Congress impeach her?Yes they can but not until they have a majority in the Senate. You see, the House votes to impeach (meaning: to charge) and the Senate tries the case (Meaning: guilty or not guilty.
This would be a most interesting situation and I for one, hope it happens!
10
posted on
05/18/2011 10:53:45 AM PDT
by
Rapscallion
(Obama is a fraud. The founders gave us the tool of impeachment for a reason.)
To: KansasGirl
To: jazusamo
Does this disqualify her from taking part in the SCOTUS decision on ObamaCare once it hits them?
12
posted on
05/18/2011 11:53:50 AM PDT
by
cranked
To: jazusamo
Did someone mention Kagan?
13
posted on
05/18/2011 11:59:32 AM PDT
by
SkyPilot
To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast
0bama, Kagan, Holder, Geithner, and all the rest of them can do whatever they want, as long as everyones too gutless to stand up to them. Which has already been demonstrated many times. Bingo. We have a government that has absolutely zero regard for the law. Who in their right mind thinks Kagan will actually recuse herself? I mean, Obama put her there precisely for this reason.
To: RightWingNilla
In case it wasnt clear, I meant that Obama put Kagan on the court primarily to defend his beloved Commiecare. There is no way she is recusing herself.
To: RitaOK
...no cigar, without a direct tie to Kagans keyboard.
Like this one?
Another email chain on March 21, 2010, entitled Health care litigation meeting, references an internal government meeting regarding the expected litigation. Kagan is both author and recipient in the chain.
16
posted on
05/18/2011 12:23:55 PM PDT
by
norton
To: jazusamo
The woman is not qualified and obviously a hack for the left.
She should be removed for corruption.
17
posted on
05/18/2011 12:26:17 PM PDT
by
dforest
To: cranked
It seems it should but being the DOJ won’t release pertinent info it doesn’t look like it will.
A justice has to recuse themselves and it’s an honor system as I understand it but a person without honor won’t do it.
18
posted on
05/18/2011 12:36:09 PM PDT
by
jazusamo
(His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
To: indylindy
19
posted on
05/18/2011 12:37:53 PM PDT
by
jazusamo
(His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
To: jazusamo
20
posted on
05/18/2011 1:35:04 PM PDT
by
Tzimisce
(Never forget that the American Revolution began when the British tried to disarm the colonists.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson