Sorry, but a Daniels presidency would be a fourth Bush term. He’s a Bush Republican to the hilt. Not what this country needs at this point in history at all. Far from it. And every one of the other candidates you list is just as bad.
Again, specify exactly how he will not be "conservative enough" (and I'm starting to believe that even Reagan would not be, to the current FR crowd)
(I'm also starting to wonder about the RINO term. What's so great another weak Republican? It seems the Party is less and less conservative every year. I'd regard "CINO" (Conservative) as a bigger slight than "RINO" (Republican). The twin jibes of "Establishment guy!" and "RINO!" seem to be mutually exclusive, are they not? The spineless GOP is the biggest obstacle for the successful implementation of the ideals of conservative voters today. It's starting to seem like RINO ought not be a smear anymore, except to those for whom party loyalty means more than the advancement of conservative ideals.)
Bush was one of the best presidents this country ever had. I’ll take Daniels over Obama any day.