Looks like it to me. The 8 is larger at the top than the bottom so is similar. The dashes are similar. The 7 is made at the same angle. The upward angle is similar. The 61 is too similar to be a coincidence.
Try it without the names and dates. It’s all conjecture, but it works:
A mother gives birth to a child at the Wahiawa Hospital, it dies the next day after being transferred to Kapiolani. The child hasn’t been named, so she’s accompanied by a hospital document that has named her after her father.
This child was born at Wahiawa one day before twins were born at Kapiolani.
The little girl born at Wahiawa dies the day after her birth, and three days later, her death is announced under the name of her father. Her documents relating to both her birth and death are sitting in their relative departments at the HDOH. The death certificate has been recorded and numbered.
But her birth data from Wahiawa is still sitting in the basket, waiting to be recorded.
Death certificates have three days to be recorded.
Birth certificates have seven days before they need to be recorded. (iirc)
On the very day that the death of the child born at Wahiawa is announced in the paper, someone, (the butler) with the help of an employee (the cleaner) removes the birth data for the dead child from the basket containing the dead child’s data, and replaces it with a fake document.
The perps, assuming that the dead child was born at the same hospital that the death certificate states, have created the situation that this fake document is now out of sequence. But they weren’t to know that, and if the mother of twins born the day after the child that died, hadn’t come forward with their birth certificates, none of this would have surfaced.
The Wahiawa data is entered and numbered according to the dates, then the Kapiolani birth data is entered. And amongst the documents is the fake ‘submitted’ on the same day as the death announcement appeared for the dead child.
The fake was entered and numbered and ended up on a list that went to the papers and that created the birth announcement.
The parents of the dead child had not named her, so she’s shown in the name of her father. When the family try to make funeral arrangements and bury her under the name they have now given her, she can’t be buried under that name because her documents show her as her own father.
The HDOH now has to amend her death certificate to show her name and that is done two weeks later. She’s also issued with a birth certificate which is now more than 400 numbers into the future from when she was born.
And she’s finally buried on the 28th of the month following the month of her birth.
Just what it tells us that the ‘dates signed by mother’ were written by the same hand, remains a mystery.
“A nurse or clerk in the hospital fills in the certificate form and gets the mother to sign it. Then the attending physician enters certain medical data and affixes his signature. Finally the hospital sends the completed certificate to the local registrar.”
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2011/05/299781/#lwKHjRuE5qkRw4SZ.99
born on the 4th, died on the 5th, death announced in the paper on the 8th, BC filed by registrar on the 10th. Death certificate amended on the 29th. Number of BC out of sequence by 400+
DUNCAN SUNAHARA INTERVIEW