If the definition of natural born citizen was so cut and dried and a matter of settled law, then why is this guy in the WH? Or why did the Senate feel it was necessary to pass a resolution and get an opinion from two noted constitutional scholars of different poltical persuasions to justify McCain's eligibility, which is also not settled law?
We need this issue resolved, i.e., natural born citizenship needs to be defined specifically as it applies to Article II, Section I of the Constitution. Only SCOTUS can do that wih any finality and specificity.
U.S. Citizens are ultimately responsible for what their delegates to the Federal and State legislatures do and fail to do in their names. Removal of certain people in both parties in the House of Representatives and Senate by election and/or impeachment will encourage the rest to do the right thing. There are some members of SCOTUS who may be liable for removal from office due to ineligibility and/or impeachment.