Agreed, but the budget Ryan offered was hardly "drastic." It was timid at best, and hardly a good starting point for negotiations.
Good point....they cut a mere two or three billion in Washington....
Meanwhile, in the U.K. they recently cut the equivalent of $119 billion, didn’t they? Washington is lame.
Ryan’s budget just barely lowered the slope of Obamuzzie’s spending curve. The word “pathetic” applies in my view. Even the Rand Paul proposal, 1.5 trillion$ in three years, still leaves us at a higher spending level than will be necessary to be solid. We really need Rand Paul times two. If we can’t get that then it’s “hello Greece”. And have you noticed in the past few days the Gleeks are lighting up again? That first putz round with borrowed money just didn’t “meet expectations”.