Now, as for this thread, can someone show me the quote where ‘the_concience’ supported abortion or homosexual marriage? I read through all the posts on this thread and didn't see it. He (she) stated clearly that they didn't think it fell in the constitutional limits of the federal government.
'I think some issues should be settled at the state level' is not the same as ‘I support buggery and think everyone should do it as often as possible.’
I have no interest in getting into a long drawn out argument with the Moral Absolutes pinglist, especially since I believe in moral absolutes. I see you all are already questioning my loyalty, conservativism and probably manhood. I'm sure someone has already checked the last eight years of my posts for proper compliance.
My question is only about why they got banned.
Sounds like a triple zot with cheese coming up judging by the amount of whine.
FR is an example of "Freedom of Association" which relates to the First Amendment and has NOTHING to do with marriage. Tell me they aren't arguing for homosexual marriage.
When debating, the_conscience continues to misrepresent what others stated. When asked for quotes, they have none.
They were zotted for Post 138 in which they state If free association has nothing to do with marriage I suppose you guys would support the State setting up forced marriages. I get the feeling you guys would be comfortable in a Muslim country.
Again, try to tell me they didn't support homosexual marriage and deserve being zotted by Jim.
And WHY are you questioning that the OWNER zotted them? Jim reads more than one post before zotting ANYONE. He has said so. AND Jim has also stated that he does NOT support Ron Paul.
Where have you been? JR has made no secret of his opinion about support for Ron Paul over the years.
I think some issues should be settled at the state level' is not the same as ‘I support buggery and think everyone should do it as often as possible.’
Actually, if you find an honest libertarian, or happen to catch them talking about it on another site, (done that), you will find them ADMITTING in so many words, that they supported homosexual marriage on FR for years under the guise of *the government should stay our of marriage.* Read it with my own eyes, I did. It is THE cover for support of it while being able to deny it by appealing to the fact that they never came out and SAID they supported gay marriage.
I see you all are already questioning my loyalty, conservativism and probably manhood.
Quite a few assumptions there, none of which apply to me.
I'm sure someone has already checked the last eight years of my posts for proper compliance.
If you find out who's been checking your last 8 years of posting history, let us know.
What 80% did you agree with with mommya? I found lots of liberal positions of hers, none conservative. Supporting the defunding of the military as a way to cut spending when there's plenty of other areas to hack, slash, and burn sends up red flags everywhere. There are far better places to start cutting than our national defense.