Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: machogirl

NBC issue aside, anyone notice how simple and clean this BC is? Just a nice, high res scan. How come it doesn’t have all the strange artifacts and other anomalies that Obama’s has?

Easy. Jindal did all that was necessary. He scanned it. BFD. It isn’t rocket science. And if Obama did a simple scan, his (phony as Pam Anderson’s breasts) BC wouldn’t look like it does.


30 posted on 05/06/2011 9:55:53 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s ( If you can remember the 60s....you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ChildOfThe60s

That’s out of my non-techie mind. I did blow it up and was disturbed to find a link, on the official WH blog about the BC, to the other released to ? fact check, kos? anyway, at the bottom of the PDF document showed it was printed from SNOPES WEBSITE. Now why wouldn’t Barry or his campaign have the one they released in 2008 and have to go to SNOPES?


56 posted on 05/06/2011 10:15:08 PM PDT by machogirl (First they came for my tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: ChildOfThe60s

This is a good one for comparison. Notice how all the boxes are tabbed to the left except for the time of birth. Notice how prominent and easily read is the seal. Notice how it lies flat with no curve along the left edge. The graphics experts should take this one and give it the same kind of analysis they gave that other thing last week and then compare the results side by side.


123 posted on 05/06/2011 11:47:19 PM PDT by Albertafriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson