Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rabscuttle385

ALL articles from the NY Times......LOL!!


177 posted on 05/08/2011 12:36:10 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and Ford trucks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies ]


To: stephenjohnbanker

Miami Herald, on Jan 21, 1984
.
“…Conservatives may not back President Reagan for reelection in 1984 unless he reverses what they consider “almost a stampede to the left” in the White House, New Right leaders said Tuesday. “Quick and comprehensive changes” in Reagan’s staff and policies are needed to win back longtime supporters in the conservative wing of the Republican Party, they indicated. Howard Phillips, who heads the Conservative Caucus, and Richard Viguerie…’


179 posted on 05/08/2011 1:00:04 AM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies ]

To: stephenjohnbanker; rabscuttle385; sickoflibs

Boston Globe, March 8, 1987

“…”I’m very concerned,” said New Right leader Weyrich, a frequent White House visitor in recent days. “The position right now seems designed to get an agreement with Moscow. It’s getting a great push from Nancy Reagan so that there can be a Nobel Prize at the end for her husband.” Adds Howard Phillips of the Conservative Caucus, “I think it may be the same game Nixon played back in 1974 at the height of Watergate, using talks with Leonid Brezhnev as a prop to show that he was still an effective president. . . “On this and other foreign and domestic issues, the concern I have is that our options are not going to be presented forcefully . . .” Weyrich is only slightly less gloomy. “In the very short-term, we’re going to know whether conservatives are just window-dressing,” he said. “Howard Baker is saying to everybody and his mother that he wants to really reach out to us. We’ll soon see.” Many White House watchers take the mood of those on the New Right as a clue to which direction Reagan is moving in, which means the signs appear to point toward the middle — recalling Reagan’s moderation and compromises during his second term as governor of California in the early 1970s. Howard Phillips accepts the analogy but adds a warning to all Republicans. “As Reagan drifted to more of a consensus politician, he bought surcease from heavy criticism,” he said. “But in the process he also spent all his time responding to his opponents’ agenda, in effect legitimizing it. Just in case anyone has forgotten, I believe Reagan was succeeded as governor by Jerry Brown.’…”

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Note this line:

Just in case anyone has forgotten, I believe Reagan was succeeded as governor by Jerry Brown.’…”
..............

That reminds me of the “Bush brought us Obama/ Pelosi / Reid” meme (nothing new under the sun is there)


181 posted on 05/08/2011 1:23:10 AM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies ]

To: stephenjohnbanker; DoughtyOne; hosepipe; sickoflibs; BufordP
ALL articles from the NY Times......LOL!!

These Bushbots and RINO apologists sound exactly like Mike Huckabee.

184 posted on 05/08/2011 8:38:05 AM PDT by rabscuttle385 (Live Free or Die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson