[TexasFreeper2009]

just got through watching the debate, and here are the impressions I was left with.

Paul - Same old quack, different year. And I REALLY disliked the panel trying to label him the “father of the Tea Party”

Cain - FAR more electable that I had previously thought.

Pawlenty - Wimpy RINO with no shot.

Santorum - Much stronger than I had thought.

Johnson - WTF is a Democrat doing running in the Republican primary?

that's my personal opinion.

[truthfreedom]

Ron Paul certainly would be one of the top picks for “father of the Tea Party”. Santelli would be another, and Palin in one or another respect.

[Stat Man]

“Paul - Same old quack, different year. And I REALLY disliked the panel trying to label him the “father of the Tea Party”
Cain - FAR more electable that I had previously thought.
Pawlenty - Wimpy RINO with no shot.
Santorum - Much stronger than I had thought.
Johnson - WTF is a Democrat doing running in the Republican primary?
that’s my personal opinion.”

Mine too. So far reading into this thread, you’re the first poster I’ve read that seems to have reacted to the debate exactly the same way I did.