Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Assassination of Isoroku Yamamoto - In comparison
Any | Editors

Posted on 05/05/2011 2:11:32 PM PDT by FoxPro

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: allmendream

As you pointed out, Congress did vote. That vote constituted a declaration of war. You will note that nothing in the Constitution describes the contents, format, etc., of a declaration of war. Consequently, it is up to congress whether or not to actually use the phrase “Declaration of War”.


41 posted on 05/05/2011 4:07:38 PM PDT by DugwayDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: JLAGRAYFOX

Nicely said. There is a Borders bookstore in my area going out of business. I’m snatching up as many military history books as I can at 70% off!


42 posted on 05/05/2011 4:11:19 PM PDT by gatorhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

“Absent a vote from Congress a state of war would not be authorized under our Constitution.”

Let me add, a ‘state of war’ is not at all dependent upon a declaration of war or even upon the constitution. A state of war exists anytime two or more are engaged in an armed conflict. A declaration of war only formallizes that state.

Our constitution assigns the power to declare war to the congress but is completely silent as to how congress shall exercise that power.


43 posted on 05/05/2011 4:11:44 PM PDT by DugwayDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: hflynn

Considering it took 8 years to find out the possible hideout, then 8-9 months does not seem out of the realm of possibility to go from “probable” to highly likely.


44 posted on 05/05/2011 4:13:27 PM PDT by Michael.SF. (When you hear hooves, think horses, not zebras.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke
Yes indeed. The legislation need not at any point spell out “By the way, under the Constitution - this resolution is a de facto implied or implicit “declaration of war”.”

But it is a necessity, one tragically overlooked in the case of Libya - giving cover to cowardly Democrats who don't want to be on record voting for war - and to cowardly Republicans who don't want to be on record voting for 0bama’s war.

45 posted on 05/05/2011 4:14:01 PM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.
When are we going to hear from the Magicians Union that the code name is offensive?

I belong to The Society of American Magicians, The International Brotherhood of Magicians, and a Magic Dealer Association.

You would never hear a complaint from us.....we know how to keep a secret.

....and if someone did complain.....we know how to disappear them!

46 posted on 05/05/2011 4:30:28 PM PDT by Focault's Pendulum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.
BS. Jarett blocked an early military air strike after August 2010. The BS she fed Obama, not that SFBRAINS needed any excuse to do nothing, to block the air strike was that there was a need for DNA evidence which could only be obtained if booths were put on the ground. This was a delay tactic by Jarett and Obama who believed it would take years to put booths on the ground. Panetta and others turned years into months, months that could have been much earlier months without Jarett and Obama interference, and the deed was done without any help from Jarett or Obama. However Jarett was told by Bill Daley if you don't take a seat in the corner we will let the public know that you and boy wonder refused to act before the next election.
47 posted on 05/05/2011 4:34:04 PM PDT by hflynn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: FoxPro

About all the mission accomplished was to enshrine the memory of Admiral Yammoto. Subsequent events would have tarnished his reputation within the Japanese hirarchy, even though he had predicted them well in advance.

The interception was a technical and airmaship feat of note. Mag compasses in the P-38 were notoriously unreliable, so it was a remarkable feat of navigation by a single pilot aircraft reportedly conducted in complete radio silence. It also posed the possibility of exposing our ability to read the Japanese naval code.

Decades later a dispute grew among the surviving praticipating pilots as to who really “shot down Yammoto”. But there are no similarities between the interception of Yammoto and the taking of bin Laden IMO. Yammoto was a serving military member. Bin Laden was a terrorist. The former was a warrior, the latter merely a rat. >PS


48 posted on 05/05/2011 5:01:11 PM PDT by PiperShade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gatorhead

Wise move!!! There is much written on American history and military activity. Yamamoto was “a gambling man”, had spent time in America, knew our industrial might and depth, understood Americans, liked a drink once in a while and loved gambling. He knew he had one shot at America, and when he did not catch our aircraft carriers at Pearl Harbor, he knew Japan was in deep trouble. The battleships had seen better days. The age of the aircraft carrier had arrived and he knew it. Pursue your reading about our forefathers. Our Present POTUS Obama knows nothing of American history and that includes the magnificent role that American Blacks have played in our history from the Revolutionary War to present. The idiot Obama has nary a clue!!! Sad!


49 posted on 05/05/2011 7:39:22 PM PDT by JLAGRAYFOX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: FoxPro
"To this day, the P-38 is one sharp looking machine."

Are you aware Kelly Johnson, the same guy that designed the U-2, SR-71 and even had a hand in the F-117 is the guy that led the design team for the P-38?

50 posted on 05/05/2011 7:48:02 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

Ah, but we have something even better to the democrats, we have a UN resolution.


51 posted on 05/06/2011 3:10:48 AM PDT by DugwayDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson