To: wizard61
Glenn questioned why wouldn’t want him alive so that we can question him more about the operations current and former (including the supposed Nuke device Al Qaeda has hidden in Europe, according to Wikileaks)..
and then he said we could kill him.
7 posted on
05/03/2011 8:25:02 PM PDT by
JoeBrooks
To: JoeBrooks
Glenn questioned why wouldnt want him alive so that we can question him more about the operations current and former (including the supposed Nuke device Al Qaeda has hidden in Europe, according to Wikileaks)..
and then he said we could kill him.
Right, that was his take. But to this poster it looks like this was done to just be done with it, no blowback. I think WH, military, CIA, everyone looked like they just preferred to not open a can of worms. I think that's fantastic for Americans; for once, we just did it, dropped'em and dumped'em. No BS political hashing, whining, all the drama queen stuff back and forth between the captive nutbag and his nutbag followers. If he was left alive, we would have had to have heard his BS for decades. Now everyone can debate as long as they want, but he's permanently out of commission and none of our guys got hurt.
To: JoeBrooks
If we had taken him alive, Holder would have put him on trial in NY and lose.
To: JoeBrooks
You know, if I were to capture OBL I might put together a nice little Islamic burial at sea on a carrier while he was being hauled below decks for a little gentle waterboarding and a nice chat.
I might put a few pictures on the internet too.
But that’s just me of course.
33 posted on
05/03/2011 10:06:06 PM PDT by
seowulf
("If you write a whole line of zeroes, it's still---nothing"...Kira Alexandrovna Argounova)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson