Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Virginia Ridgerunner; onyx; Al B.; sarah fan UK

“I know Brent Scowcroft. I worked with Brent Scowcroft. Sarah Palin’s no Brent Scowcroft.”

**************************************

Thank God she’s not Brent Scowcroft. I note for the record that Scowcroft’s long tenure In Washington included stints with Nixon, Ford and George H.W. Bush, all opponents of Ronald Reagan. Scowcroft never worked for Reagan in any executive level position. I wonder why.

The neocons, of which Scowcroft is a charter member, have talked us into four wars since Bush 41, two of which have lasted for a decade, and three of which are going on as we speak. In so doing, they have weakened our military and spread us very thin. They have also foisted ridiculous, politically correct rules engagement on the military, which prolong wars and increase our combat casualties. This is something Reagan never would have countenanced. Neither will Palin. If the American military is committed under President Palin, it will be totally committed and victory will be total...no “nation building” nonsense that the neocons are so enamored of. This is not a function that the military can or should perform. And it results in a lot of brave Americans getting killed by IEDs, while they are babysitting rogue countries.

______________________________________

“My other thought: The surge in Iraq works. The surge in Afghanistan works. There’s an Arab Spring. The world obviously needs American strength and leadership more than ever. And now everyone (even Palin, to some degree) decides, hey, time to back off? It’s foolish substantively and politically.”

*****************************************

If Reagan had been President, and had committed troops, there would never have been any perceptible surge....THE ENTIRE OPERATION WOULD HAVE BEEN A SURGE. And it would have been over in a matter of weeks or a few months. Not 10 freaking years. Palin is apparently of the same mind as the Gipper. Great.

“Do Republicans really want to run as Obama-lite in foreign policy?”

I don’t know what Republicans want. I don’t care either. Conservatives want a foreign policy modeled after Reagan, which credibly threatened the use of “MASSIVE FORCE” and used that threat to achieve American objectives, such as toppling the Soviet Union without firing a shot and liberating over half a billion people.

RINOs like Kristol want the GOP to continue as the perpetual War Party, until the military is totally demoralized and the country is totally bankrupt. No thanks. We have had a quarter century of them. Back to the Brookings Institution with the lot of them.


32 posted on 05/03/2011 4:20:09 PM PDT by Brices Crossroads
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Brices Crossroads
Thank God she’s not Brent Scowcroft. I note for the record that Scowcroft’s long tenure In Washington included stints with Nixon, Ford and George H.W. Bush, all opponents of Ronald Reagan. Scowcroft never worked for Reagan in any executive level position. I wonder why.

Hmmm ...

Ex-Sen. Tower Will Probe NSC : Reagan Also Puts Scowcroft, Muskie on Iran Inquiry
November 26, 1986|Associated Press
President Reagan today appointed former Sen. John Tower, former Secretary of State Edmund S. Muskie and one-time national security adviser Brent Scowcroft to a special board that will investigate the activities of the White House National Security Council staff in the secret sale of U.S. arms to Iran.

Maybe that's not an "executive level position" but the appointment indicates that Reagan didn't hate him.

The neocons, of which Scowcroft is a charter member, have talked us into four wars since Bush 41, two of which have lasted for a decade, and three of which are going on as we speak.

Hmmm ...

Don't Attack Saddam
by Brent Scowcroft, August 15, 2002
Originally Published in the Wall Street Journal

Scowcroft was more of realist.

Palin's been more of a neo-con than Scowcroft.

34 posted on 05/03/2011 4:29:17 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: Brices Crossroads
"The NeoCons, of which Scowcroft is a charter member"

Scowcroft is a Realist, not a NeoCon.. In fact Scowcroft is considered to be the leader of the Realist School. The 3 wise old republican realists are Kissinger, Scowcroft, and James Baker. The 3 wise old democrat realists are Brzezinski, Sam Nunn and Lee Hamilton.

There are 3 foreign policy groups in the GOP: Realists, NeoCons, and Isolationists. A GOP president's foreign policy team will be composed of Realists and NeoCons. Usually, Realists will serve as Sec of State and NSA while the SecDef job goes to a NeoCon.

OTOH there are 3 foreign policy groups in the dem party: Realists, Liberal Interventionists, and antiwar pacifists. A dem prez's foreign policy team will always be composed of Realists and Liberal Interventionist and usually the Sec of State job goes to a Liberal Interventionist while Realists will serve as NSA and SecDef.

The Realists dominated GHW Bush's foreign policy while the NeoCons dominated GW Bush's foreign policy. Reagan's first term was dominated by the NeoCons and the Realists dominated the second term.

39 posted on 05/10/2011 1:49:16 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson