I think a first examination is our aid to Pakistan. Why should America be going into debt financing a country who cannot even control who is living in a fortified compound basically across the street from a local police station? Also in town? A brigade of Pakistans 2nd Army and a military school that is said to be Pakistans version of West Point. The fortified nature of Osama Bin Laden’s compound tells me that they did not want just anyone to peek in.
A call to end aid to Pakistan would be a budget saving measure.
There are so many things we are not aware of concerning this whole issue of Ben Laden since we first went to war. And a host of disinformation has abounded for years. Additionally all the back room deals stuck which allowed the US to continue fighting without further causing more issues which may or may not have occurred if revealed Ben-laden was a prisoner.
Further Ben-Laden has been only the figure head which united terrorists...Al Sawarari is the brains of all the attacks...he simply needed Ben-ladens money. The two would not have been successful with their agendas apart from each other. And those agendas are Sawarri’s from the get go...Osama was primed by the Muslim Brotherhood...so these two were a match.
Al Zawarri is the one we want...Be Laden was simply the “Religious” and “Financial” means for Al Zawarri.
So I could see Pakistan striking a deal they'd keep Ben Laden under protective custody, so to speak...and let him communicate as he would ...in order to know what they were up to... and might be why we have been able to stop any further catastrophes in our country since 9/11.
>> “I think a first examination is our aid to Pakistan. Why should America be going into debt financing a country who cannot even control who is living in a fortified compound basically across the street from a local police station?” <<
.
True.
Pakistan is a repeat of our foolish venture into the Balkans in the ‘90s. We were helping the wrong side there, and this looks like ‘Deja vu all over again.’
.