Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bigtigermike

I think a first examination is our aid to Pakistan. Why should America be going into debt financing a country who cannot even control who is living in a fortified compound basically across the street from a local police station? Also in town? A brigade of Pakistan’s 2nd Army and a military school that is said to be Pakistan’s version of West Point. The fortified nature of Osama Bin Laden’s compound tells me that they did not want just anyone to peek in.

A call to end aid to Pakistan would be a budget saving measure.


35 posted on 05/03/2011 11:44:07 AM PDT by jonrick46 (2012 can't come soon enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: jonrick46
I'm not convinced that Ben Laden’s being there wasn't a Cooperative effort between the Us and Pakistan. Were the high walls, guarded from within and without...to keep him IN isolation as a prison, and that with the purpose of not announcing his capture because doing so would create all sorts of other issues besides that of fighting the war??? Especially now that these wars are fading out...perfect time to orchestrate his capture or death.

There are so many things we are not aware of concerning this whole issue of Ben Laden since we first went to war. And a host of disinformation has abounded for years. Additionally all the back room deals stuck which allowed the US to continue fighting without further causing more issues which may or may not have occurred if revealed Ben-laden was a prisoner.

Further Ben-Laden has been only the figure head which united terrorists...Al Sawarari is the brains of all the attacks...he simply needed Ben-ladens money. The two would not have been successful with their agendas apart from each other. And those agendas are Sawarri’s from the get go...Osama was primed by the Muslim Brotherhood...so these two were a match.

Al Zawarri is the one we want...Be Laden was simply the “Religious” and “Financial” means for Al Zawarri.

So I could see Pakistan striking a deal they'd keep Ben Laden under protective custody, so to speak...and let him communicate as he would ...in order to know what they were up to... and might be why we have been able to stop any further catastrophes in our country since 9/11.

49 posted on 05/03/2011 3:49:15 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: jonrick46

>> “I think a first examination is our aid to Pakistan. Why should America be going into debt financing a country who cannot even control who is living in a fortified compound basically across the street from a local police station?” <<

.
True.

Pakistan is a repeat of our foolish venture into the Balkans in the ‘90s. We were helping the wrong side there, and this looks like ‘Deja vu all over again.’
.


59 posted on 05/03/2011 9:57:28 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Going 'EGYPT' - 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson