Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: af_vet_rr

Bin Laden deserved to be killed, but the whole incident highlights the hypocrisy of Obama, the Democrats, the MSM and the entire left. Had this happened under GWB’s watch, the same bunch which refuses to criticize Obama would have threatened to drag W in front of the International War Crimes Tribunal. Obama is getting a free pass because the Republicans support the action and the left will not criticize The One under any circumstances.


128 posted on 05/03/2011 3:57:34 PM PDT by littleharbour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]


To: All

For Anyone Who Has
"Fought To Defend The Constitution"
THEY Know It Can't Be Done
From A Golf Course!!
Help Keep FR In The Fight!!
To Donate Click Here!!

129 posted on 05/03/2011 3:59:51 PM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

To: littleharbour
I won't deny that they are hypocritical, and unfortunately we have some hypocrites on our side. That's the way politics are when the parties switch office. It's one thing if you change your mind because of certain factors, but it's another if you change your mind simply because it's a different party in power. It's like all of the Democrats who voted for Bush to invade Iraq and then years later pretending they were against it and wanting us out. They were supporting it to win points in elections. Hell, I was for the invasion of Iraq originally just because I thought Saddam and his sons were evil personified, but I've come to accept the fact that we shouldn't have done so and that regime change for the sake regime change is bad, and Libya is reinforcing that viewpoint for me. That's completely different from Democrats who supported Bush in 2003 simply because a lot of potential voters supported it. It's completely understandable for me to change my mind given my reasoning, but they are changing their minds because of public opinion and not any rational thinking.

I'm coming around to the idea that Obama favored special operations to get a physical confirmation of OBL while the military was pushing a missile strike is backwards. I bet Obama just wanted them to blow up the compound and not risk anything else, because Obama loves his drones flying around Pakistan, just like Clinton preferred missiles in Afghanistan rather than troops who could have done more. I cannot see the CIA wanting a predator strike or a bombing run by the Air Force and giving up all of that potential information that was available in the compound.
130 posted on 05/03/2011 5:11:12 PM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson