[Captain Kirk]

Palin is moving toward Ron Paul’s position. Good! However, I prefer the real thing.

[lonestar]

I prefer the real thing.

Coka Cola?

[rbmillerjr]

“Palin is moving toward Ron Paul’s position. Good! However, I prefer the real thing.”

Insanity and anti-Americanism in not a foreign policy, nor something that Palin is heading for.

[McGruff]

Palin is moving toward Ron Paul’s position. Good! However, I prefer the real thing.

So you're one of those Ron Paul nutcases. Now I see the reason for your illogical posts.

PS - Sarah Palin will never be a surrender monkey like Ron Paul. To suggest that shows you're as much of a cook as Ron Paul.

[Springfield Reformer]

Palin is moving toward Ron Paul’s position. Good! However, I prefer the real thing.

Not really. Lots of sane people don’t want to start wars they don’t have to. That doesn’t make them Libertarian. Reaganism and Paulism are fundamentally irreconcilable. Reagan believed, as Palin does, in being loyal to our allies through thick and thin, including Israel, because it is America's best interests to do so. Not Paul. Reagan believed, as Palin does, that it’s important to identify and soundly defeat America's real enemies, whether foreign or domestic. Not Paul. And neither Reagan nor Palin would compromise US sovereignty to the demands of the modern illegal immigration movement. Apparently Paul is shifting to a weaker position on immigration. But as for me, I’ll take Reaganism, in heels if necessary, over that Libertarian mishmash any day of the week.