Your opinion is noted, but I disagree. I see what you see, and when I see what you don’t like, I usually don’t like it either, and look up the profile of the individual(s). If no profile, which is most often, then the recent, or timely date they joined is sufficient to form an opinion. I don’t see this invasion of DU. When they do come, they are usually so “transparent” they are zotted immediately.
Freepers instinctively know a DU type when one gets past the rat guard on the hawser.
Like so many you are deeming those you disagree with their perspectives, their opinions as they must be DU. IOW “they can’t be Conservatives if they don’t agree with me” sort of thing.
I believe that there is a strong amount of viewers here that do not want to be talked into supporting Palin, Bachmann or any other pureblood definitive conservative.
I believe that there are to a degree a certain amount of anti-birthers here that are in the frame of mind to use any excuse to debase a poster if they have any history of supporting birtherism. On that note the term itself is being written into stone it appears, and a lot of people for “some” obvious reason just plain do not like that.
On a closing note my summary of any recent faults of Fr is that people are becoming a bit too narrow visioned, expecting the perfect Mr. or Ms. Conservative. I can imagine a thread about Michelle Bachman that was heavily into her faults would be zotted pretty quick.
Anyhow, have a good day, I am off to my underpaid day job and may your day be productive.