Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fantasywriter
That I should be called a “troll” or that I should be called a “liberal” for having the AUDACITY to argue with some of the more unhinged, on this thread -—

Only serves to show how unhinged you, and many Birthers, have become.

I wish to be considered a “Birther” and defend “Birthers” on Liberal blogs. We have a right to ask Obama questions, to ask for documents, and to doubt his slippery and dishonest answers.

Obama became famous, rich, and the PRESIDENT of the United States due to a book written by a terrorist, and due to MYTHICAL BS about his life.

Yes, if you will have me, I defend the idea the Obama has not been honest with us about his past or his heritage.

However, if Obama was born on US Soil? I hold the position that he IS a Natural Born Citizen.

You wish to earn converts to your cause by insulting people who are not with YOU 100%?

How is that working for you?

Have you ever run a political campaign, in your life?

Have you ever won a Court case, in your life?

You don't win votes by kicking people out of your “club”.

You don't win a jury vote by ticking off, offending or ALIENATING the jury.

As LEADERS, you who insist on attacking me, personally, are failures, since nobody is following you.

268 posted on 05/01/2011 8:33:59 AM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies ]


To: Kansas58

Hypothetical:

Let’s say you are a Founder, and your desire is to protect this country which you love, and which you know will be threatened by subversive forces. You write in the NBC requirement, and in your mind this is to rule out certain non-American, un-American or even anti-American (Manchurian) candidates from winning an election and fundamentally threatening the Republic from within.

Fast forward. Theoretically speaking, posit this scenario. Karl Marx, although already married, makes a legal visit to the US and ‘marries’ a 17 yo black girl [or so we are told; we have not seen the marriage license]. While the child is young, the mother divorces this man, moves to a foreign country and has her son adopted by a foreign national. The parents hate free market capitalism, and indoctrinate their son in the superiority of foreign cultures.

When eventually the son returns, he’s turned over to communists. They rear him with a virulent hatred for whites and traditional American values. When he gets to college he makes no secret of his affiliations: he selects radical Marxists and the most radical of all brands of feminists as friends, since these are the only people he feels comfortable with. Later he writes a book and dedicates it to the dreams he received from his father, Marx. This father supported the taking of 100 % of the citizens’ money by the state, and doling it out as the State sees fit. The son knows this, and writes a paean to his father’s ‘dreams’ because he shares them, and wants the world to know he shares them. He writes a second book in which he unabashedly offers his view of whites: “White men’s greed runs a world in need”.

Now he runs for POTUS. We have come to a time in our nation’s history when asking any kind of question whatsoever of a biracial man is considered racist, so he gets a complete pass during the election. When asked to show his original long form BC, he spits in our faces. (The evil whites have no right to question their biracial Marxist Messiah!) He rules in the kind of luxury and opulence enjoyed by tinpot dictators, and his executive orders further the impression that he’s not a president but a king. He runs the US down all over the world, apologizing for us in humiliating and demeaning ways while praising countries with wretched human rights records. He nationalizes banks, car companies, healthcare, etc. He subverts our interests to those of the UN. He pushes for, and gets, a treaty favorable to Russia and unfavorable to us. He seeks to destroy out military by homosexualizing/sodomizing it. There’s much more, but you get the picture.

Now as a Founder, can you honestly say that this isn’t precisely what you were trying to protect us from, with the NBC requirement? You wanted to assure that a US born and bred person, who knew and respected our culture and traditions, held the highest office in the land. Is not Obama EXACTLY the person the Founders feared, and tried to exclude? He is fast destroying the country they loved and sacrificed for. And it’s not a coincidence. He is not a NBC; he doesn’t understand us yet he hates us rabidly. And if the Constitution had been respected and honored, he would never have attained the sinecure from which to do his filthy work.

The alternative is that as a Founder, you wrote the NBC requirement (1) to insure that future British subjects could not be discriminated against, by being barred from siring US presidents, and (2) so that men like Marx, Mao, Hitler, Stalin—or worse—could spawn a future POTUS, so long as they ‘married’ an underage American girl in order to do so. If you can’t see the cognitive disconnect in that, then there’s nothing more I can say; you just don’t get it.


271 posted on 05/01/2011 8:45:03 AM PDT by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies ]

To: Kansas58

You lie


275 posted on 05/01/2011 8:56:31 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Some, believing they can't be deceived, it's nigh impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson