You’re an end all expert on OCR?
Not.
OCRing images is used for searching a great deal, with no intent to edit.
Just consider Google’s rendering of physical books into searchable text by the millions.
The scanning software has options to just convert to a flat image file, or to identify sections and map them into separate layers for additional processing.
It’s your kind of hysterical ignorant self-authoritative rantings about a subject you barely understand which is fast destroying the viability of the “birther” movement. I want viable proof of inelegibility as much as anyone, but also know that legal proof is legal proof, and that vapid ramblings hurt the cause.
duh DUHYHUhhhhhuhhhuhhduh DUHduhudhudhhhhhDuuuUUUuuhhhh is what you should have said you idiot moron
The computer does not know if you have any INTENT to edit, and that does not make any difference to this argument you COULD edit it if you wanted to, once the OCR is done.
OCR tries to make text and words from a picture. Is that simple enough for you? dumbass? IT TAKES A PICTURE AND TRIES TO GENERATE THE WORDS AS TEXT that is all I ever said.
I have written imaging software for a living, so excuse me if my “ramblings” sound too authoritive and hysterical for you.
I know what computers and digital scanning software can do- it cannot do this THE WAY THEY WANT YOU TO THINK it has been done.
Instead of attacking other freepers if you dont like this issue FIND ONE YOU DO LIKE and go after Obama would you please?
This one just happens to be WHAT I DO FOR A LIVING
Proof of forgery would be more than vapid.