Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ThinkingBuddha

The fact that the national GOP didn’t give her enough money or that Harry Reid was engaged in voter fraud had something to do with it. She was the Tea Party candidate and a strong conservative. Anything wrong with that?


6 posted on 04/29/2011 2:26:27 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: kabar

“The fact that the national GOP didn’t give her enough money or that Harry Reid was engaged in voter fraud had something to do with it. She was the Tea Party candidate and a strong conservative. Anything wrong with that?”

I’m with you, the place for her to run is in the HOUSE. I don’t buy into the Karl Rove / MSM crap about her being unqualified (heck, look at the president). Then, 4 years from now after she builds up a record, she can, maybe, take a second run at Reid.


9 posted on 04/29/2011 3:21:26 PM PDT by BobL (PLEASE READ: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2657811/posts))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: kabar

That is not a fact in any way, shape, matter, or form. She got a significant amount of support from the national groups - including the NRSC and Rove’s groups, among others who were on the air fighting the battle. Not to mention she raised an enormous amount of her own cash for the race. She was a conservative but very gaffe prone - personality played a big role in her loss.


10 posted on 04/29/2011 3:27:27 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson