Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: KansasGirl

Your post simply indicates how little you know of attire for a bride. I’ve seen “Poor” brides with more elegant hair than Kate wore....and I wasn’t refereing to if or not the two were happy or not. After 5 years of shacking up you’d assume they’d found some degree of contentment with one another.

Further any comparisons between Diana and Kates wedding is fruitless...Diana was 19 yrs. old....Kate’s almost 30.....Big difference in every way. Besides Kate has been practicing for 5 yrs to take her role...Diana had none but was under the tutor and control of the “mums” still.

Again my reference was to Kates frompy veil and hair....could have been far better and certainly more regal than it was....and it should have been. Flat against the skull as her’s was was not appropriate. Even a slight veil lift would have been helpful.


1,078 posted on 04/29/2011 7:22:18 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 862 | View Replies ]


To: caww

[Your post simply indicates how little you know of attire for a bride.]

LOL. Again, I don’t think her veil and hair could have been more beautiful. Her consultants and she made the right call wearing it down, and I absolutely loved her veil. It was elegant, beautiful, and fitting for a princess. Also, the veil was fitting of the gown.


1,095 posted on 04/30/2011 6:16:13 AM PDT by KansasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1078 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson