[Minus_The_Bear]

I don't think you know what you are talking about.

Ron Paul isn't in favor of abortion.

[John D]

Ron Paul isn't in favor of abortion.

Then why did he insist that an under-aged girl be allowed to cross state lines in order to get one?

[BlackElk]

MtB: Ron Paul is certainly not in favor of DOING anything to eliminate abortion. Ron Paul hides behind the 10th Amendment while (wink!, wink!) signalling his social revolutionary supporters not to worry because (SCOTUS notwithstanding) there is just nothing he can do other than oppose funding since it just has to be a state question. Of course, ever time a state acts to restrict abortion in the slightest way, SCOTUS or a federal lower court step in to enjoin any effective defense of life. Oh, well! Wink! Wink!

Then paleoPaulie poses for holy pictures solemnly affirming that he is very pro-life (he just can't DO anything about it, you see) and telling us how he has delivered thousands of newborns as an OB-GYN (so has Dr. Bingham, the Planned Barrenhood killer at Norwich, CT and many others nationally like him. So what?).

This is not unlike el run Paulie opposing earmarks at press conferences while stuffing appropriations bills with earmarks for his district and voting no on the main bill while his colleagues deliver the votes that engorge Paulie's constituents with federal pork. Cue another solemn press conference wherein the surrenderman cluck, clucks that Congress is wasting money again but HE voted NO (on final passage, that is)!