So what are you saying? Are you saying he is just dishonest, or are you saying he is against only earmarks that do not benefit his district?
He votes against bills with earmarks like he says. If the bill passes his voters get stuck with the bill. Your heads I win tails you lose point is that his voters should pay taxes for the earmarks in the bill Paul voted against without getting anything.
He never said earmarks to his district dont benefit his district. His voters pay the taxes, that doesnt benefit them or the deficits of the bill itself. .
You point is just BS attacking your own strawman
He votes against bills with earmarks like he says. If the bill passes his voters get stuck with the bill. Your heads I win tails you lose point is that his voters should pay taxes for the earmarks in the bill Paul voted against without getting anything.
He never said earmarks to his district dont benefit his district. His voters pay the taxes, that doesnt benefit them or the deficits of the bill itself. .
You point is just BS attacking your own strawman