Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ordinary_American

I wonder how many people on this forum actually read the article before commenting?

Or grasp the significance?

“information might suggest that Barack Obama’s birth data were updated around 2003 or thereafter.”


16 posted on 04/26/2011 7:16:46 PM PDT by Ordinary_American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Ordinary_American
Wasn't that around the time he said in a debate, when an opponent said he wasn't born in this country, “So what, It's not like I am running for president” or something to that effect? Also newspaper articles about Kenyan born being elected to the state senate?
34 posted on 04/26/2011 7:48:55 PM PDT by gidget7 ("When a man assumes a public trust, he should consider himself as public property." Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Ordinary_American

I guess it’s late. I did read the article, but I don’t think I understand the significance.


36 posted on 04/26/2011 7:53:21 PM PDT by brytlea (A tick stole my tagline....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Ordinary_American

It jumped out at me, too.

My understanding of research done by “Miss Tickly” (Freeper TerriK?) is that in response to her many UIPA requests, Hawaii inadvertently confirmed the birth records were amended as recently as 2006.

Further, according to the Post and Email, there is good reason to believe he had no birth records on file before that year.

http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/04/08/did-hawaii-have-any-records-on-obama-before-2006/


44 posted on 04/26/2011 8:04:46 PM PDT by .45 Long Colt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson