I wonder how many people on this forum actually read the article before commenting?
Or grasp the significance?
“information might suggest that Barack Obamas birth data were updated around 2003 or thereafter.”
I guess it’s late. I did read the article, but I don’t think I understand the significance.
It jumped out at me, too.
My understanding of research done by “Miss Tickly” (Freeper TerriK?) is that in response to her many UIPA requests, Hawaii inadvertently confirmed the birth records were amended as recently as 2006.
Further, according to the Post and Email, there is good reason to believe he had no birth records on file before that year.
http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/04/08/did-hawaii-have-any-records-on-obama-before-2006/