Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: phi11yguy19
They also had to ratify their statehood before continuing into admittance into the union.

No, they could ratify their constitution, but until that ratification was voted on by Congress, it had no effect. There was no time, between the ratification of the state constitution and president signing the bill admitting the state to the union, that the state was an independent nation.

The Enabling Acts (now we're down to what, a 25% rule)

30 out of 50 states passed through formal US territorial status. Maybe that qualifies as 25% in your math. For the record, there were the 13 original states. Five states were formed out of other states, one was an independent country annexed at their request, and one was admitted to statehood shortly after being ceded by Mexico, before a territorial government was organized.

were the owner's authorization to allow formation of a state (the owner being the U.S. in the case of the territories - i.e. all states had to agree...

Well, a simple majority, but I guess in the world were 60% equals 25%, it should be expected that 50%+1 equals "all."

Once they've codified their state powers (as every other state had), they are admitted as an equal.

Colorado ratified its state constitution in 1865. Their admission as a state, however, was vetoed by Andrew Johnson and it wasn't until 1876 that they entered the Union. What was Colorado's status during those 11 years?

869 posted on 05/02/2011 1:55:42 PM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 861 | View Replies ]


To: Bubba Ho-Tep
There was no time, between the ratification of the state constitution and president signing the bill admitting the state to the union, that the state was an independent nation.

Indeed, it was simultaneous granting of Statehood and membership into the union of staaaaaates for those carved out of the territories. Who's disputing that? they didn't wave a wand and "create" states as you say repeatedly.

enabling acts enable the creation of states. acts of admission enable membership in the union. somethings they compounded them, but either way, the recognition of statehood always preceded admittance to the union.

how do you continue to ignore examples proving your narrative is false...
AN ACT to admit the State of Michigan into the Union, upon an equal footing with the original states.
yet still take yourself seriously?

who was admitted to the union? (the state of michigan, not some part of the NW territory) who were they on equal footing? the original states. did they agree to equal licking of the federal boot or equal footing with the other states?
877 posted on 05/02/2011 2:37:39 PM PDT by phi11yguy19
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 869 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson