Replies

You're still justifying the evidence as solid when it has been proved to be wrong? Gee, I'd love to see your definition of inconclusive evidence.

He is to blame? As another poster suggested, you're nuts.

and it's a crime that can be covered up with literally a mouse click or key stroke

That, is total BS. It's not like drugs that can be flushed which is what they use to justify their NAZI like armed entries.

At least the guys dog didn't get executed.

"You're still justifying the evidence as solid when it has been proved to be wrong? Gee, I'd love to see your definition of inconclusive evidence."

You're entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts. The story CLEARLY states and his own attorney stipulates that it was ROUTER that was used to download internet porn. The evidence that established probable cause to search his residence was quite clearly ACCURATE an TRUTHFUL.

"He is to blame? As another poster suggested, you're nuts."

Yes, he's to blame. If he wasn't to blame, I can promise you he'd be suing.

"That, is total BS. It's not like drugs that can be flushed...That, is total BS."

Then you have absolutely no idea how child-pornographers work.

I would love to hear about all the child-porn cases you've successfully prosecuted. I've prosecuted about five.

It's not like drugs that can be flushed

So what if drugs are flushed? Modern forensics can still find the traces in the toilet water -- then, you can add attempted destruction of evidence to the other charges.

This testosterone-poisoned Rambo-wannabee crap has to end, PDQ.