[OldDeckHand]

"I can tell you are a cop appologist. These police had no evidence that would justify a search warrant let alone using a frickin' swat team. "

If you can show me where the "SWAT" team was involved, that may mean something. Fortunately, it's been established that it was a word created from the figment of the original poster's imagination.

Therefore, I can tell you're an idiot.

[RobRoy]

>>If you can show me where the “SWAT” team was involved, that may mean something. Fortunately, it’s been established that it was a word created from the figment of the original poster’s imagination.<<

Give it up. The straw man has been burned alive. Stay on topic.

[for-q-clinton]

OK let’s replace SWAT with ICE. What’s the difference. Fact is agents came in with guns drawn and ready.

Whether it was SWAT, ICE, FBI, CIA, Secret Service or Janet Reno really doesn’t matter. The fact that they are agents from the government storming into an innocents man house is what is at stake.

They didn’t do basic detective work to find the real perv. So I guess you can say it was “Good enough for government work” to these guys. What’s violating one man’s rights when it comes to capturing someone who is looking at kiddie porn? I’m all for nailing the kiddie porn bastards, but let’s make sure we have the right person first. If not, let’s just all agree to have random inspections of our homes and computers to find kiddie porn—are you ok with that?

[decimon]

If you can show me where the "SWAT" team was involved, that may mean something. Fortunately, it's been established that it was a word created from the figment of the original poster's imagination.

Therefore, I can tell you're an idiot.

Good grief. What if I'd referred to them as 'Police.'