Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bruinbirdman

I’m glad this deranged sack of crap is out of my state.

We all know a significant percentage of muzzies like killin’ in a bloodsport around the world for as many centuries as this cult is old, to this day.

Nothing good can come from this. He does not represent today’s Christianity and does a disservice to all those of any (almost) faith.

He is scum. A provocateur.

We all understand the 1st Amendment and don’t need this asshole out there to remind us, JMO.

And this jackass is coming back week to stir up trouble.

He’s no less a scumbag than the Westboro scums.

It’s provocative and unnecessary serving no purpose.


16 posted on 04/23/2011 8:25:58 PM PDT by quantim (Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: quantim
It’s provocative and unnecessary serving no purpose.

It's "free speech".

Get with the program.

23 posted on 04/23/2011 8:28:28 PM PDT by Thumper1960 (A modern so-called "Conservative" is a shadow of a wisp of a vertebrate human being.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: quantim
It’s provocative and unnecessary serving no purpose.

Well who made you the all-seeing arbiter of what serves a purpose and what doesn't?

28 posted on 04/23/2011 8:31:07 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: quantim
He’s no less a scumbag than the Westboro scums. It’s provocative and unnecessary serving no purpose.

Hey, those guys are associates. Maybe he can get them to join him in a protest...Now that would serve a purpose.

32 posted on 04/23/2011 8:33:57 PM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate Republicans Freed the Slaves Month...April.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: quantim

Almost every word you said about Jones is true, and every objectionable thing he has said and done are his Constitutional right. The jailing of a citizen for exercising his constitutional rights is anathema in a Free Republic.


35 posted on 04/23/2011 8:34:46 PM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla (Liberty and Union, Now and Forever, One and Inseparable -- Daniel Webster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: quantim

Let’s see, how does that quote go, “First they came for....”


38 posted on 04/23/2011 8:36:38 PM PDT by FourPeas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: quantim

When I wear my T-shirt that I had made, saying “Crusade Against the Mohammedan Death Cult” I do it to make a statement against Satanic evil, and for America, Christianity, Western Civilization, and for humanity in general.


55 posted on 04/23/2011 8:49:01 PM PDT by ansel12 ( JIM DEMINT "I believe [Palins] done more for the Republican Party than anyone since Ronald Reagan")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: quantim

You would have done well in Hitler’s Germany.


66 posted on 04/23/2011 8:54:42 PM PDT by bwc2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: quantim

And you calling him nasty names and curse words is not provocative?


100 posted on 04/23/2011 9:29:41 PM PDT by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: quantim
As far as I am concerned the Muslim religion re-declared war on us on 11 Sep 2011. While this guy is radical, any placating of our side only emboldens these miscreants even more.

I agree that he should use a different way to fight this battle, but I will grant him that I agree that Muslims want to destroy us.

127 posted on 04/23/2011 10:08:30 PM PDT by catfish1957 (Hey algore...You'll have to pry the steering wheel of my 317 HP V8 truck from my cold dead hands)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: quantim
"It’s provocative and unnecessary serving no purpose."

I'll have to strongly disagree with you there.
He has brought the unacceptable hypocrisy to the surface, right in everyones faces in an undeniable fashion. He has exposed the liberal establishment for what it is: biased against one, favoring another. Forget about his cackling regarding i slam and the koran, you don't have to agree with his methods. What you cannot deny is the side-effects. The public now asks of itself: what if I am next? What if the jack-boots disagree with ME?

I don't care much for troublemakers, just like you. BUT the minute we start justifying the squelching of voices in the name of peace and correctness, we cease to be America.
Some heads need to roll over this, IMHO

140 posted on 04/23/2011 10:23:40 PM PDT by FunkyZero ("It's not about duck hunting !")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: quantim
I’m glad this deranged sack of crap is out of my state. We all know a significant percentage of muzzies like killin’ in a bloodsport around the world for as many centuries as this cult is old, to this day. Nothing good can come from this. He does not represent today’s Christianity and does a disservice to all those of any (almost) faith.

you have so much to learn and so little time to do it. You have no concept of what true freedom is, none at all... Because someones actions offend you...as long as they don't threaten you, shut up...they have the same rights as you do to expres their inane opinions. Freedom is not free...you have to put up with a lot to insure that everyone has freedom....that's why it usually works here and seldom works anywhere else!!! The deranged sack of crap that you wanted out of your state.....he'll be replaced with another sooner or later....live with it....you may not be attractive to him either He is scum. A provocateur. We all understand the 1st Amendment and don’t need this asshole out there to remind us, JMO. And this jackass is coming back week to stir up tro

151 posted on 04/23/2011 10:42:26 PM PDT by terycarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: quantim

“It’s provocative and unnecessary serving no purpose.”

The good thing about the first amendment is that your opinion, or that of the Muslim police chief in Dearborn, should be completely irrelevant. That you think it serves no purpose is irrelevant. It’s political speech. It’s protected.

That he can provoke guards your right to have such measurably moderate things to say. It guards my right to say that all non-citizen Muslims should be deported tomorrow and that all immigration of Muslims should stop and that all mosques taking foreign money should be shut down today.

That he was jailed is an outrage and should be very worrying to all of us. That a Muslim police chief feels free to do this is a measure of the confidence of the Muslim community that America will do nothing to defend itself against Sharia and burkhas for their granddaughters.

I hope the chief and the dept. is sued for tons of money for violating the guy’s civil rights. But that won’t happen because the jury will be from Dearborn.


170 posted on 04/23/2011 11:22:48 PM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: quantim

That 1st Amendment sure is a pesky thing ain’t it?

If the moslems don’t like it, they are free to leave.

We may not like how some people exercise their Constitutional freedoms and God given rights, but in this country, we aren’t supposed to throw people in jail for something that they MAY do and the perceived consequences arising from them, real or imagined.

If the westboro freaks don’t get jail time, if al sharpton didn’t get jail time for inciting a riot in which actual and innocent people died, then why is it ok for this guy and not them?

Your post smells of fail.


183 posted on 04/23/2011 11:47:20 PM PDT by SZonian (July 27, 2010. Life begins anew.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: quantim

Freedom is so messy. I hate it too.

Muslims have a right to live in peace and practice their religion of peace with out some nut job forcing them to cut off a bunch of dhimmi heads on Easter.


206 posted on 04/24/2011 12:42:14 AM PDT by Tramonto (Keep Portland Weird; Keep the Weird in Portland.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: quantim

You are a fascist.


212 posted on 04/24/2011 5:48:20 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: quantim
It’s provocative and unnecessary serving no purpose.

In your opinion.

We have to allow the speech of others with whom we disagree. That is the essence of free speech.

Free speech does not require serving a purpose by consensus of the community.

The government cannot determine whether your speech has any purpose because it will inevitably impose tyranny upon those among us who speak unpopular words or whose words threaten the power of existing leaders.

215 posted on 04/24/2011 5:57:20 AM PDT by NoControllingLegalAuthority (What this country needs is an enema.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: quantim

“It’s provocative and unnecessary serving no purpose.”

Yes it is.
Arresting someone because their legal, if annoying, future actions might be met with violence by others is provocative and unnecessary serving no purpose. That’s why such arrest is prohibited in the Constitution.

Oh, wait, you were referring to the possibility of free speech, not the actual baseless illegal arrest. Got it. Twit.


231 posted on 04/24/2011 11:49:38 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (Great children's books - http://www.UsborneBooksGA.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson