No, a “reasonable” person would examine the actual evidence presented and then come to a conclusion about that evidence, but then birthers aren’t really known for being “reasonable.” So I didn’t expect you to use reason, much less some logic. I expected exactly what I got.
LMAO You really think you can pass off obviously incredulous sources don’t you?
>> a “reasonable” person would examine the actual evidence presented
In a given context, yes, the evidence is contradictory, but if you rearrange a few things, it’s not.
The ‘birthers’ aren’t fighting the details, they’re fighting the obstruction.