Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TigersEye

“”African” would not have been used in any time or place. Numerous races live in Africa in the millions. White, Hispanic (if you call that a race), Asian, negroid, Semitic and others.”

I misspoke, I meant on the COLB it was probably changed from Negro (or whatever was on original certificates) to African, just as it probably originally said “White” and now says “Caucasian.” Since the COLB is just an “abstract” they could easily decide to “update” the terminology.


170 posted on 04/23/2011 8:54:56 PM PDT by GOPrincess
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]


To: GOPrincess

I’m sorry that doesn’t make sense. “African” would still be meaningless no matter what era we’re talking about. I’ll be glad to admit I’m wrong about that if a legit BC is found that has “African” on it or an updated guidebook for the ‘70s like the one posted for the ‘60s.


179 posted on 04/23/2011 9:39:11 PM PDT by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/15/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson