Posted on 04/23/2011 4:26:06 PM PDT by TommyDale
Snopes' Certification of Live Birth shows supposedly issued in August, 1961 but the Revision date is 11/01. What is REALLY interesting is the light blue time stamp that reveals the actual date of issuance as Jun 6 2007. See the picture for the highlighted area showing the time stamp from the back side where it bleeds through. Hold it up to a mirror and you can see the date!
(Excerpt) Read more at msgboard.snopes.com ...
OK, maybe not 100%. Apparently, some weren't paying attention, but the information was there for anyone to see, as my links prove.
Second, you are saying “drop the eligilibity issue now”.
Where? Show me the post, and post the text where I said this.
I even went to "the full story" at that link and there isn't even a mention of a poll there so that is four for four failure to make your point.
So what? "Fifty-Six Percent Say Wright Makes Them "Less Likely" To Vote For Obama" is still higher than the % that your poll said never heard of him, without including those whose votes weren't affected.
That poll doesn't say what percentage of voters had ever heard of Wright either. Fail again.
"Poll shows Rev. Jeremiah Wright hurting Barack Obama" shows that the information was out there, and anyone who was interested had access to it.
I even went to "the full story" at that link and there isn't even a mention of a poll there so that is four for four failure to make your point.
No, but it shows that the situation was reported by the MSM including CNN.
Only a fool or a dissembler wouldn't know or pretend not to know that poll questions that aren't precisely designed will return inaccurate and misleading results. Obviously everyone who had never heard of Wright would answer that he hadn't been a factor in their opinion. This type of word parsing in polls has been unmasked and debunked for the phony tripe that it is for years around here. As you said; the sources are flaky. Well known for their intentionally misleading polls.
You did say everyone and 50% is a long way from "everyone" to most rational FReepers.
So you lied about what it said that's what.
If you honestly believe that the information about Wright wasn’t out there for everyone to review, and that half never heard of Wright even in November, run with it.
How?
Of course it was out there, no one has contested that, but clearly no more than 50% of voters had heard it. Your contention was that “everybody” had heard about it and that has been proven false. Anyone paying any attention to politics would have known that without looking up backing evidence. You were wrong. Your persistence in pushing it and your denials of what you clearly said show you to be totally dishonest.
How? I explained that in detail in #304.
You call me a liar, yet you keep pushing that one poll even as others show the number to be much higher.
Your contention was that “everybody” had heard about it and that has been proven false.
OK, not 100%, but do you honestly believe that 50% never heard of Wright, even in November?
Yes, where you again pushed that bogus 50% poll.
Not to mention you're ignoring that the 56% doesn't come from asking the question "have you heard of Rev. Wright." Pathetic.
Now the most credible poll posted is a bogus poll? You’re reaching for straws with your pathetic attempts to win a point. Loser!
Forget this toad, lj. He’s outed himself as a lying liberal 0bot troll. Your radar is in good working order. ;-)
There were two race category blanks on Junior's BC, neither of which applied to him.
So? That wasn’t the point you made. I responded to the point you made not some unsaid information.
That case was one fine example of the conspiracy theory phenomenon, fortunately relatively uncontaminated by domestic partisan politics and solvable by expert technical analysis, which showed conclusively it was just Big Brown delivering packages.
Go back to DU/Cass Sunstein’s office/KOS or where ever you belong.
And your aim and array of weapons is top notch.
(My previous) Where? Show me the post, and post the text where I said this.
Go back to DU/Cass Sunstein’s office/KOS or where ever you belong.
Repeat, show me the post, and post the text where I said this. If you can't find it, then admit you were wrong.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.