Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalVigilance
Dear EternalVigilance,

Here's my view of things.

Abortion is a species of unjustified homicide. It's a criminal matter. Criminal matters are generally matters that are appropriately addressed at the state level.

Laws against murder and manslaughter are appropriately the province of the states.

Thus, the Supreme Court should return the matter to the states.

However, there is certainly a federal interest in play here. Imagine if a state repealed all its laws against private homicide. Or laws against the private killing of one class of persons. Blacks, Jews, Christians, Muslims, Republicans, homeschoolers. Whatever. It would become a federal issue to vindicate the rights of persons not to be killed privately.

Remember that the Constitution reposes in the federal government the obligation to ensure a republican form of government in each state. It's difficult to figure out how one has a republican form of government in states that refuse to pass laws to deal justly with crimes that violate basic rights.

Thus, playing this out, once Roe was overturned, it would be the right and duty of the states to pass laws regarding abortion.

States that made abortion illegal and that provided some appropriate way in criminal law to vindicate the rights of unborn persons wouldn't need any interference from the federal government.

States that refused to do their duty in this regard should then have imposed on them by the federal government some sort of legal regime to vindicate the rights of unborn persons.

To me, that seems the right way to do things.

But it's a two-step sorta thing - first you gotta return abortion law back to its proper venue - the states. Then, states that refuse to get right, the federal government should act.

Just how I see it.

Let me mention another heresy, LOL.

I'm a Catholic and thus don't believe that any abortion whatsoever should ever be legal in anyway whatsoever. Furthermore, Catholic teaching states that this conclusion is obvious through the application of natural law, and does not require Catholic faith or supernatural grace to come to it. Thus, the Church teaches, and I believe, that ALL MEN ARE OBLIGATED to acknowledge that law may not justly permit abortion. Ever. In any case. Any abortion at all.

Yet, I know that many men's minds are clouded by sin, and it might be a while before I get enough men (and I'm speaking, of course, about all adult humans, not just the males of the species) to vote in accord with these views to put them in place in our representative democracy.

Thus, if states generally, and the federal government when the states are in breach of their obligations, passed laws forbidding abortions except in cases of rape, incest, life of the mother, I'd take that.

At least until the next week. That's 96% of abortions, and it's a good first start.

I'd be back for the other 4%, and yes, I know, it might become well-nigh impossible to get the other four percent, but, hey, I'm not going to sacrifice the lives of 1.2 million kids a year because I haven't been able to rescue the last 50,000.

I know, I know, I'm a “moderate.”

Just remember, EternalVigilance, I'm a moderate who is a lot closer to you than to folks who say they're pro-life but would vote for a pro-abort “because we don't want Obama to win.”


sitetest

339 posted on 04/21/2011 6:00:11 PM PDT by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies ]


To: sitetest

The Constitution of the United States imperatively demands the equal protection of all innocent persons.

Every officer of government, at every level, and in every branch, swears to God and to his fellow men to support and defend that.

It’s not optional.

All men are created equal. It’s America’s first and most important cornerstone principle, without which the whole house will fall down.


359 posted on 04/21/2011 9:14:38 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Sadly, the Fourth Estate has become the Fifth Column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies ]

To: sitetest
Thus, if states generally, and the federal government when the states are in breach of their obligations, passed laws forbidding abortions except in cases of rape, incest, life of the mother, I'd take that.

That's exactly how the child-killers got their nose in the door. In the states. Through "exceptions."

And it's all a violation of the imperative, explicit requirements of the Constitution of the United States.

"No person shall be deprived of life without due process of law."

"No State shall deprive any person of life without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

Frankly, it is the exceptions mentality that assures the continuation of abortion on demand in this country, until God's judgment falls on us.

"God who gave us life gave us liberty. Can the liberties of a nation be secure when we have removed a conviction that these liberties are the gift of God? Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just, that his justice cannot sleep forever."

-- Thomas Jefferson


360 posted on 04/21/2011 9:25:14 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Sadly, the Fourth Estate has become the Fifth Column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies ]

To: sitetest

New tagline...


361 posted on 04/21/2011 9:27:52 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (What part of NO PERSON SHALL BE DEPRIVED OF LIFE do you fail to understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson