But he thinks Roe should go.
Roe, in one way or other, must go if unborn children are to ever again be protected in law. Whether by a judgment of the Supreme Court overturning, vacating, or gutting the decision, or whether by constitutional amendment, or whether by Congress finding its balls again and taking jurisdiction over abortion away from the courts, Roe's gotta go.
It'd be only one step toward the ultimate goal of protection of all unborn people in law, but it would be a pretty big step.
The thing I don't like about this guy is that even though he's anti-Roe, he comes off as something of a cheerleader for abortion “rights,” and so the question becomes, which is greater, the good he does by backing overturning Roe, or the damage he does by using the bully pulpit of the presidency to promote abortion “rights”?
I don't know the answer. If he becomes a serious candidate, I'll pray about it.
sitetest
Well, not sure what his ‘plus’ is over all the others that have a tracker record, but with a position like that *I believe in abortion rights (only at the state level), it doesnt make sense to me.