Skip to comments.
WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED IN 2,066 YEARS?
55 B.C.
| CICERO
Posted on 04/21/2011 10:47:17 AM PDT by Wuli
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
More from one of those dastardly "dead white men". /sarc
1
posted on
04/21/2011 10:47:21 AM PDT
by
Wuli
To: Wuli
2
posted on
04/21/2011 10:55:53 AM PDT
by
Jim Robinson
(Rebellion is brewing!! Impeach the corrupt Marxist bastard!!)
To: Wuli
The Romans then voted for the instatement of Consuls who would beat down enemies and conquer new lands. Remember, Britain wasn't reduced until 30 AD or thereabouts, 75 years later!
Riches rolled into Rome like a tsunami of gold.
Now that doesn't mean he was wrong, but it turned out he was narrowly focused on a single method.
3
posted on
04/21/2011 10:57:32 AM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: muawiyah
By that logic we should invade China or Saudi Arabia to save ourselves. Somehow I doubt that would work out.
I wouldn't be surprised to see the rise of imperial tyranny though, as the citizen-slaves of America crave security and the dole amidst unrest and poverty.
4
posted on
04/21/2011 11:04:44 AM PDT
by
Liberty1970
(Liberty, not License. Freedom, not Slavery.)
To: Wuli
Actually we've learned a lot. But what societies haven't learned is something remarkably simple. Societies are no better than the people comprise them. No matter what form of government a country has, if the people aren't of quality, the country will not be. This is a bitter pill for most to accept and liberals will never accept it.
Societies decline because because the ratio of problem solvers to problem makers falls below a intangible threshold. When this happens, society goes into a tailspin and it's near to impossible for it to recover. This is where the US is today. Obama's election merely confirms this.
5
posted on
04/21/2011 11:05:52 AM PDT
by
truthguy
(Good intentions are not enough.)
To: Wuli
6
posted on
04/21/2011 11:06:04 AM PDT
by
smokingfrog
( sleep with one eye open ( <o> ---)
To: Liberty1970
Invade China?
Why would you do that? China's a net loss ~ as every invader soon discovers. There are lot of people there, with great demands for food and stuff.
But Saudi? They've got oil. Actually, the reports are Iraq has even more oil. I think since we are already there we should stay there and start pumping.
7
posted on
04/21/2011 11:08:44 AM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: SunkenCiv
8
posted on
04/21/2011 11:08:55 AM PDT
by
DCBryan1
(FORGET the lawyers...first kill the "journalists". (Die Ritter der Kokosnuss))
To: Wuli
Nero fiddled while Rome burned; Obama golfs as America burns.
9
posted on
04/21/2011 11:11:11 AM PDT
by
Jim Robinson
(Rebellion is brewing!! Impeach the corrupt Marxist bastard!!)
To: Wuli
Actual quote from Cicero: “The arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled, and assistance to foreign hands should be curtailed, lest Rome fall.”
The various additions and modifications floating around on the interwebs are phony. Although there is a real good chance Cicero would have agreed with many if not all of them.
To: Wuli
There is only one thing wrong with this, that is it is one of those Internet lies. Not said by the man in 55 BC.
To: Sherman Logan
Damn, beat me by 3 seconds.
To: truthguy
No matter what form of government a country has, if the people aren't of quality, the country will not be. This is a bitter pill for most to accept and liberals will never accept it. Societies decline because because the ratio of problem solvers to problem makers falls below a intangible threshold. Absolutely correct. This is why a liberal should be trusted with a position of authority no greater than a college professor or ambassador to Krapistan, IOW, the theoretical world where their cockamamie theories actually work . . . at least in their imagination.
13
posted on
04/21/2011 11:16:40 AM PDT
by
Vigilanteman
(Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
To: org.whodat
To be fair, the wisdom of a statement is not inherently dependent on who says it. Truth is truth and lies are lies regardless of the source.
Although reasonable people take the source into consideration.
To: Wuli
16
posted on
04/21/2011 12:01:01 PM PDT
by
Razzz42
To: org.whodat
Actual source for most of the verbiage is a 50s historical novel about Cicero.
Who, BTW, was not entirely an admirable character. Set new standards in thinking highly of himself, even for a Roman aristocrat, which took some doing.
But admirable characters were thin on the ground at the time, at least in public life, and tended to not last long.
To: truthguy
No matter what form of government a country has, if the people aren't of quality, the country will not be. ...
...This is where the US is today. Obama's election merely confirms this.
About eighty percent of the US Senators do also.
The disturbing thing is that this has truly changed ("hope and change") in the US over the last fifty years. It is virtually impossible to describe that to the newer generations, vis-a-vis historical revisionism, distortion, academic pedantry; other than to personally live one's values.
18
posted on
04/21/2011 12:04:16 PM PDT
by
jnsun
(The Left: the need to manipulate others because of nothing productive to offer.)
To: Wuli
I want to see Caesar’s birth certificate!!!
19
posted on
04/21/2011 12:05:22 PM PDT
by
Night Hides Not
(If Dick Cheney = Darth Vader, then Joe Biden = Dark Helmet)
To: Night Hides Not
I want to see Caesars birth certificate!!!Is Trump our Brutus?
20
posted on
04/21/2011 12:22:31 PM PDT
by
AmusedBystander
(I'm sure that Obama loves his country, I'm just not sure which country is his.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson