Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: La Lydia

LOL. Bring it. Mexico attacked Texas and lost. Mexico attacked the USA and lost. I doubt there would be a problem doing it again...


14 posted on 04/21/2011 10:22:26 AM PDT by El Laton Caliente (NRA Life Member & www.Gunsnet.net Moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: El Laton Caliente
Mexico attacked Texas and lost.

Today is San Jacinto Day!!! The day great-grandpappy captured Santa Anna and brought him to Sam Houston. Slap down!

20 posted on 04/21/2011 10:28:13 AM PDT by bgill (Kenyan Parliament - how could a man born in Kenya who is not even a native American become the POTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: El Laton Caliente

Very interesting that the demonstration is in L.A. Just wondering... why not a city in Texas?


36 posted on 04/21/2011 10:55:23 AM PDT by momtothree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: El Laton Caliente

LOL. Bring it. Mexico attacked Texas and lost. Mexico attacked the USA and lost. I doubt there would be a problem doing it again...


While you are historically correct, I must point out that BOTH those conflicts occurred in the first half of the 19th century. That was back when we still had a government that was (more or less) on our side and had to abide (again, more or less) by the Constitution.

That is NOT the case today. Let’s get REAL honest here. Yes, American citizens still outnumber illegal invaders. Yes, for the most part, American citizens would probably have the advantage when it came to weaponry — at least in a fight between citizens and illegals. Exceptions would be where the Mexican Drug Cartels got involved. They have terrorist supplied bombs and BATF supplied AMERICAN Taxpayer funded Weapons — thanks to Mama Janet Napalitano. And American Citizens may be a bit more motivated since they would be defending hearth and home.

BUT, here’s the REAL kicker — The Federal Government would intervene in behalf of the illegals. We all know it. And if they didn’t, or the Military refused to, then the UN would send forces in as “peace keepers” on their behalf. We all know that’s what would happen. Could anyone envision Obama sending troops to PROTECT the people of Arizona, Texas, NM or California? But I certainly could see him sending troops to defend the illegals FROM the citizens of those States!

Think about it....


101 posted on 04/21/2011 7:34:25 PM PDT by patriot preacher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson