Posted on 04/19/2011 5:40:07 PM PDT by cradle of freedom
I thought the President of the Senate was the VP.
House Speaker, minority leader and Senate majority leader and minority leader are chosen by their respective parties members in the chamber.
The Speaker is elected by the House. (See Article 1 Section 2 of the Constitution.) Technically, the House could elect someone who was not a Member of Congress as the speaker, but has never done so.
The Vice President is the president of the Senate according to the Constitution. The President Pro Tempore is mandated by Article 1 Section 3 and is elected by the Senate. By Senate Tradition, it is typically the longest serving member of the Majority party who is elected to this position.
House Rule X governs the selection of Committee Chairs. They are selected by a vote of the House.
Got Google ???
Got Google ???
The Senate President is chosen by the Electoral College. The Vice President is the President of the Senate.
“The Majority Whip (speaker) of the house is the only one that can bring impeachment against the President.”
The majority whip is not the speaker of the house. And any house member can introduce a bill of impeachment.
I think you mean The VP can break a tie vote in the Senate.
I know that each party selects its leaders, but what I would like to know is the actual process. Whether it is done in a totally free way as by a secret ballot or through an open face-to-face manner. I think this is the key to who has the power.
I am only getting a whiff of this but I think I smell a skunk. If legislators are not allowed to vote in secret, they they will be strong-armed by the most powerfull members of the legislature. This could keep a small clique of people in control of the Democrats and Republicans and the financial interests that support that small clique can control the whole legislative branch. I think this is key.
That must be an internal rule. I’ve never heard of it. But the speakership is a powerful position.
There’s the president of the senate (the vice-president of the United States) and the president pro-tempore, who is the official head of the body in the absence of the president (usually the longest serving member of the majority party).
I’m afraid that I’m not getting my point across. It is about who CONTROLS THE POWER in the legislative branch. This is what I am wondering about. If they select their leaders by secret ballot, then the majority will not be so easily controlled by a small elite group. If they have to announce their selection for the leader, then they can be intimidated or bribed by the more powerful members. Think “card check”. Card check is a scheme by the unions to intimidate rank-and-file union members into accepting a union. With card check the workers have to sign a card voting on whether they want or reject a union. This can make workers vulnerable to intimidation by the union thugs. If on the other hand, the workers are allowed to choose whether they want a union by secret ballot, they will feel free to vote their true feelings.
I think the newscaster were saying it was Constitutional.
Do you think that we really have a congress that truly represents the will of the people?
Well it’s constitutional because each house can choose its own rules. But there’s nothing in the constitution about the powers of the speaker.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.