Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RBW in PA

Before you get your panties in a wad; she didn’t want the Sec of State to have all the power in deciding elections. Remember Soros?


8 posted on 04/18/2011 6:20:57 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: freekitty
Before you get your panties in a wad; she didn’t want the Sec of State to have all the power in deciding elections...

And the better idea is what?

16 posted on 04/18/2011 6:24:50 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: freekitty

This actually gives more power to the Sec’t of State as there has to be no actual proof offered of qualifications...exactly why people are disturbed over this situation with Obama.


19 posted on 04/18/2011 6:25:37 PM PDT by imfrmdixie (A people that values its privileges above its principles soon loses both. Eisenhower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: freekitty

I think you guessed her reason for veto. I would have been leery of such a possibility/probability.


189 posted on 04/18/2011 11:28:59 PM PDT by noinfringers2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson