Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: stockpirate
Those are sockets on the tops of the pillars - the thing had a roof or top stones like Stonehenge, and it was heavy but could slide off in an earthquake (& flood?) without some sort of ball and socket system. Also, they've confirmed that the whole site was deliberately buried to be preserved. So was the roof/tops taken off when it was buried? If so, where are those stones?

Great post, OP. Fascinating. At least 12,000 B.C., and how did they move such massively heavy stones, let along carve them so precisely?

29 posted on 04/18/2011 5:22:09 PM PDT by Talisker (When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on its own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Talisker

Let me take a wild guess:

They were building an early version of Fukushima, and they lost containment and buried it all in sand?

LOL


38 posted on 04/18/2011 5:42:14 PM PDT by PastorBooks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: Talisker
So was[sic] the roof/tops taken off...

It is possible that there were no roofs. Or that they employed wood/organic materials which had rotted and fallen in at the time it was decided to bury the site at some much later date. Maybe the old site was deemed "evil" by later settlers.


39 posted on 04/18/2011 5:42:48 PM PDT by Big Bronson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: Talisker

I don’t know anything about this sort of thing but the oval stone in the middle with the rectangle inside looks like it goes right on top of one of the pillars- reminds me of LEGOS.


59 posted on 04/18/2011 7:50:32 PM PDT by Tammy8 (~Secure the border and deport all illegals- do it now! ~ Support our Troops!~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson