Nothing like trying to downplay a direct connection between Trump and Soros. You Trumpettes are pretty pathetic in trying to make a case for the Donald.
“Nothing like trying to downplay a direct connection between Trump and Soros. You Trumpettes are pretty pathetic in trying to make a case for the Donald.”
Palin supporter here unequivocally. BUT
Trump is performing a service by going on the attack against the Devil. He did take the lead on birth cert. that most of us agree needs resolution. His attacks on OBum are significantly more aggressive than “most” of the potential candidates. If his success continues, he will hopefully lay the groundwork for a candidate that has “real” conservative credentials (see line 1 of response above).
Just because some of us like what he is saying now to stir the pot doesn’t mean we like his tattered past or, for that matter, support him as the GOP nominee.
Those that really do support him NOW (for nomination) are either RINOs or they are responding to someone who filled a vacuum by saying things they wanted to hear that nobody else was saying. As time passes, they will tend to sober up.
I suppose “Trumpette” is supposed to be a slur? Frankly, my skin is thicker than that. Concern about adolescent name calling is something I abandoned decades ago.
This was potentially the first thread attacking Trump that I thought might have worthwhile information in it. It doesn’t, and fails on that score. The linked article makes absolutely NO reference whatsoever to Soros. Following stories on the Fortress Group that is discussed in the article shows again no connection between them and Soros. So: Where’s the beef?
I freely admit I know precious little about high finance, but one thing I DO know is that there are very few entities to whom one can turn when their business ventures require hundreds of millions of dollars. Few have those kinds of resources, and fewer still the willingness to risk them.