This is New America's Michael A Cohen ...
Posted on 04/16/2011 8:57:04 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner
Look how Chump operates. Caught red-handed now with his vicious attacks on George Bush, who most conservatives had issues with, he now says but for Bush there would have likely been no Obama. That may well be true. I have been a harsh critic of Bush's spending, including in my book. But Chump was calling Bush EVIL and demanded his IMPEACHMENT because of the Iraq war and in the middle of that war. He said Bush lied to get us into Iraq. His comments were vile and outrageous, not unlike the America-hating leftists who sought to undermine are armed forces there. Now he wants us to believe that his criticism of Bush was because Bush's poor record set the stage for Obama? Chump attacked Bush over Iraq because if you were a big-mouth, attention-seeking liberal, it was the thing to do. He had no altruistic or principled conservative motive for doing so at the time and expressed none.
As recently as last year, while conservatives and Tea Party activists were organizing and rallying against Obama, Pelosi, Reid and their radical agenda, Chump was helping to fund some our opponents. He contributed to left-wing, Tea Party-hating menaces like Chuck Schumer, Anthony Weiner, and Harry Reid. What about his contributions to Charlie Crist, while Crist was running against Marco Rubio? Did he donate to any of the Tea Party candidates? Did he contribute to the Tea Party movement in any way, with time or money, before today? Why not?
Chump also praised Nancy Pelosi. He thought she was great. I played the audio. I guess he was just mistaken, again. He supported universal health care, but not any more, of course. He supported abortion and gay marriage, but that was then, this is now. He supported John Kerry for president in 2004, but that's because Bush was so evil. He leaned on government officials to use eminent domain against a little old lady whose home happened to be in the way of a parking lot he wanted to build for one of his casinos in Atlantic City, but he has always been for private property rights.
So now Chump rails against China and demands Obama's birth certificate and we are supposed to swoon over the man. But when asked about the Ryan budget, he turns stupid again -- he says Ryan should not take the lead on this, we need a bipartisan consensus to move forward? And with whom do we build this bipartisan consensus? Reid? Obama? Is Chump really this dumb, or is he, once again, trying to figure out which way the wind is blowing?
Chump is a phony and dissembling. He called a hastily organized press event this morning because I, and others, are on to him.
TRENDING: Trump lashes out at George W. Bush and Obama
Today he is speaking at a local Tea Party rally. And why? Because now he wants our support, not because he supports us or our principles, or ever did. Chump is about Chump. And he thinks we're too stupid to notice. Are we?
Those are not the same person. One is Michael A Cohen and one is Michael D Cohen.
You didn’t hear Ryan going after him yesterday? You aren’t listening. Or you don’t care about the issues Ryan is working on.
What we need is someone with the balls to stand up to obama and fight dirty. You can’t take out a dirty politican by being nice. Trump appears to be the only one willing to get into the pig sty we call politics.
That seems like a pretty significant observation.
Is post 66 wrong?...
Ryan is awesome.
He should run for POTUS.
Double check the spell check (self) it’s not “when he doesn’t get the not” but “when he doesn’t get the nod.”
Yep.
If Trump started pitching the idea that we need to ELIMINATE the dept of Education, Department if Energy, etc he might actually do some good.
Not completely, Michael D is still a rabid lib and I am finding some similar affiliations to Michael A (is it father and son?)
This is New America's Michael A Cohen ...
Fine.
But Levin tends to put the Constitution on the front burner while Rove seems to want it to go away.
Levin is pro-individualism and pro-liberty.
Rove favors the ruling class and statism.
And if I’m not mistaken, Trump has already made what I would consider anti-Palin comments.
Very interesting thread. Thanks for starting.
If you can point to even one Trump anti-Palin comment, you would not have to deal with my irritating defense of Trump.
:)
That would be a deal breaker for me.
Well and good. Don’t deter, but don’t follow either.
Why not wait until you get your story straight and then post them. Also, I read that HuffPo article about Soros losing interest in Obama...there was no mention of Trump.
OK, different Cohen but Michel D’s affiliation with and working for Democrats should still send chills down anyone’s spine who trusts Trump. He is just as much a rabid Lib as Michael A.
bttt
Thanks for the link!
I don’t disagree with you, but I really question Trump’s motives and agendas and because of that I don’t trust him. He has been rather cozy with a lot of some of the very worst libs, the Hildabeest and Pelosi to name just two. If he can expose the Deceiver in Chief with this birth certificat thing, then he has my support for that. But as far as me supporting him for President, never going ot happen unless he winds up as another McCain. In which case we are eff’d once again.
(read down the thread)...
Different Michael Cohen but just as liberal. Just go by the first link in #66.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.