Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Spaulding

“...we should assume he was until there is proof otherwise...” So you think that I can go down to the Passport Office and get my passport as they “...will assume I am a U.S. citizen unless there is proof otherwise...” I don’t think so...I appreciate the complete nature of your “natural born citizen” analysis, but I cannot accept this phrase as being legitimate. The burden of proof lies with the applicant, not the other way.


139 posted on 04/14/2011 8:25:58 PM PDT by jennings2004 (Sarah Palin: "The bright light at the end of a very dark tunnel!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]


To: jennings2004
Jennings2204, there is no proof necessary. The Constitution was interpreted by at least ten justices, all providing the same definition: A natural born citizen is a child born on our soil to citizen parents. The issue is, remarkably, deliberate illiteracy - citizens who find some satisfaction in the mystery deliberately created by the concealment of Obama’s records, and seemingly deliberately ignoring the clear, though not so simple truth.

You will note that not one birth certificate conspirator has questioned the quotations I posted earlier. There is no doubt, as both Morrison Waite and John Bingham told us. Some part of the public does not want to discuss truth.

How likely do you think it is that should Obama continue to campaign - he may not - he will bring out the birth certificate he told us about in one of his books? Chester Arthur used the same ploy, hiding his birth records, to distract the inquisitive from looking into the naturalization of Arthur's Irish father (which didn't occur until Arthur was fourteen).

If Trump doesn't clearly address the real issue, natural born citizenship, his purpose will have been to separate those with real concern for our Constitution, those who understand why our framers required that our president be a natural and not a naturalized citizen, from the radical fringe preoccupied with manufactured mystery around Obama’s documents. He will be playing Ross Perot.

Obamaprobably was a mediocre student, may have falsified Illinois Bar documents, probably has falsified his military registration. But he has told us he ia not a natural born citizen, and never told us he was. That fact, repeated and repeated, invalidates his presidency. It is the determining issue, which is being obscured by completely unnecessary conjecture about birth certificates.

I believe he has a birth certificate, and when he produces it the embarrassment will silence the public about the real and important issue, the real concern which caused John Jay to ask Washington to be sure natural born citizenship was in the Constitution, about which Jay wrote in the first four Federalist Papers - allegiance to our republic and our Constitution. Barack did not inherit allegiance for our republic - jus sanguinis - from his parents. He inherited hatred for individual freedom. He inherited a belief in forced redistribution - From each according to his ability and to each according to his needs. Our framers tried to protect us and we are being destroyed, most likely by the half of society which depends upon redistribution for survival. Our governemt workers and beneficiaries of transfer payments want Obama to stay. It doesn't matter that he is intentionally destoying what is left of the private sector.

159 posted on 04/14/2011 9:46:17 PM PDT by Spaulding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson