You've got it backwards. I take the same position on the BC "issue" as Michelle Malkin, Glen Beck, Ann Coulter, and the editorial staff of National Review.
You, on the other hand, are siding with RINO Donald Trump, Hillarybot and 9-11 truther Phil Berg, and vicious anti-semite nutjob Andy Martin.
It's pretty obvious that it's you who's with the moonbats, not me.
Nice liberal talking points. Every single Obot troll on FR has memorized the list of conservatives, or pseudo conservatives, that agrees with their position. Coincidentally, Daily Kos, DU, HuffPo, and any and all other moonbat groups ALSO agree with those scattered few names you tossed out.
So why do YOU agree with Kos, DU and HuffPo across the board, when it comes to Obama’s eligibility??? Why do you agree with Keith Olbermann, Rachel Maddow, and every other hate-spewing moonbat of the left???
The question I asked was, is there one point-even one, on which you are not in lockstep with Kos, DU, HuffPo, Olbermann and Maddow?
Of course you agree with them on Every Single Point. So you will just retread your short list of non-moonbats, and hurl your tired old accusations. But go ahead and do it anyway. I enjoy hearing you say that HuffPo, DU, Kos, Olbermann and Maddow are the world’s bastions of truth and integrity, when it comes to Barry’s COLB.
How about this. Do you agree with Coulter that what the Muslims in this world need most is a hot shower and a conversion to Christianity? Yes or no?