Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mandaladon

Depending on the type of plane..fighter, bomber, I’ve read that as much as 25-30% of the plane is devoted to the pilot/crew..space, protection, life support systems...eliminate this, and you can substantially increase payload/distance..and of course, the danger tot he crew..


8 posted on 04/13/2011 9:14:10 AM PDT by ken5050 (Save the Earth..It's the only planet with chocolate!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ken5050
I’ve read that as much as 25-30% of the plane is devoted to the pilot/crew..space, protection, life support systems

It is actually a bigger constraint than that. Humans are a fixed size. So if the plane gets smaller that percentage goes way up. This means in order to make a plane cost effective you have to built it a certain minimum size. Also people are a certain shape which dictates things like a canopy which really increase your frontal area (drag). So lets say you decide you want a nice small plane that carries 1 or 2 bombs and fills the role as a sort of reusable cruise missile. Making a UAV this size and shape is easy and cost effective. Making such a craft into a manned vehicle just does not make sense. So you change your plans and make it bigger. And of course that means you can make fewer of them.
26 posted on 04/13/2011 10:01:16 AM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson