To: econjack
Not to mention if the tax is levied at the Retail/Wholesale level, IMHO that will make the good subject to pre-tax thievery i.e. Truck Jacking and the return of the “Mob” a-la the Soprano's, Big time. Just think goods less the 23% tax and more.... Many here would not buy the good hot because it is wrong, but how many others we know would not be that centered to resist this temptation.
I get nothing but crap from the fair-taxers when I bring this up, but it is the real world, they need to deal with it and they still don't have an answer.
6 posted on
04/10/2011 8:50:07 AM PDT by
taildragger
(( Palin / Mulally 2012 ))
To: taildragger
There is not much difference between evading paying 23% at the counter or 23% of income. They both are illegal, they both hide the taxable thing.
So what's your answer to people not paying income taxes? The answer to nrst non-compliance is the same.
See - no crap - just easy truth.
Any tax system will have non-compliance. Any. To minimize non-compliance make the system perceived as fair, easy to understand, and transparent.
15 posted on
04/10/2011 11:27:40 AM PDT by
Principled
(Get the capital back! NRST!)
To: taildragger
I haven’t done extensive analysis, but when I looked for a place on the 1040 form to enter income earned from extortion and smuggling, I didn’t find it. I also failed to find a way to deduct bribes and kickbacks for the under the radar business expense.
I called the IRS to inform them of their oversight, but they just seemed very confused and started asking pesky questions.
31 posted on
04/11/2011 3:44:18 AM PDT by
listenhillary
(Social Justice is the epitome of injustice.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson