But wait, earlier the BLS numbers that I posted were bunk and the FBI figures were golden, what changed? Finally see where the FBI was including over 300,000 civilian and admin personnel in their count, that's why the total number was just over one million.... it was added to their count of just over 700,000 SWRON COPS...
Here is YET ANOTHER FINE EXAMPLE of your inability to make a coherent argument... its okay for you to change the facts, right?
Your a cop... hypocrisy just come with the job, right?
Anyone can find out, IF IT ACTUALLY EXISTS, but they have to take a couple extra steps that they shouldn't have to, all because of your refusal to back up the information that you asserted. You can provide a link to eliminate the need for searching.
You show your lack of comprehension skills brilliantly right here, your lack of any ability to debate... you cannot have it both ways, either its easy or its not. If its as easy to get as you say it is then by that very point alone, I cannot hide it from anyone... as you claim that I am doing.
False dichotomy. When one hides something, it doesn't mean that it cannot ever be found. Rather it means merely that the one hiding the information is attempting to make it far more difficult to locate. I can hide something, without making it unobtainable. What is funny about the situation here, is that you claim to be afraid of posting a link to the case because of your name being referenced in the case. This is the explanation that you used to defend your inability to post the case here. I suggested that because your information would be accessible to one looking, that your explanation isn't rational.
One who makes an assertion has the burden of proving it. It isn't acceptable to make others go search out the truth of the thing asserted. The fact that one could locate the information (if it actually exists) doesn't negate the fact that you are hiding the information. Your attempt at a False dichotomy is pretty pathetic, this isn't an either/or situation.
See, this is what I;m talking about, your inability to comprehend. You are trying so hard to be so smart yet you are falling so short. You are currently rolled up on two points, with two different people. One a lack of reading comprehension, the other a lack of simple math skills. Yet you stand defiantly on both with your hands clasped over your ears screaming LALALALALALALALALA!!!!! As loud as you can, ignoring those who are pointing out your mistakes on both.
Ad hominem. Lack of Foundation. You are asserting that this is the case, but as I have pointed out, it patently is not. You then stamp your feet and pretend that if you only just insist long enough, it will become so.
This what I'm talking about, this is the cop in you, your inability to admit your wrong. This is why so many of your brothers and sisters end up in jail, losing a job and sued. because they have no ability to admit they might be wrong and to learn from it. Instead they continue to dig the hole they are in deeper and deeper, just like you are doing here.
You are projecting again.
What part of this simple point passes your understanding?
You might think that you are making "simple points" but in reality, you are doing no such thing. You are twisting yourself in circles, and then claiming that you "won."
We already went over this clown. In post 105, I told you that the FBI counted a little over 700,000 sworn FULL TIME, State and Local Officers, and the Feds employ about 188,000 in addition to these.
The numbers that you posted list 883,600. Notice how the FBI numbers generally track with the BLS numbers, something else I also told you, but that both only count FULL TIME employees.
So what we have here, is yet another example of you selectively interpreting information to fit your agenda.
You refuse to acknowledge the words “FULL TIME”. You refuse to acknowledge “State and Local”. You refuse to acknowledge 700,000 + 188,000.
You refuse to acknowledge that 883,600 (your number) > 800,000 (your claim).
You refuse to acknowledge where I said “employees” in the same post where I differentiated between the same and “Sworn officers”.
Yet you claim that *I* can’t read? What do you call what you did?