Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: patlin; Red Steel; Fred Nerks; rxsid

http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=xQVmAAAAIBAJ&sjid=6Y8NAAAAIBAJ&pg=6596,1619003&dq=two+citizen+parents&hl=en


145 posted on 04/09/2011 2:32:50 PM PDT by bushpilot1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]


To: bushpilot1

good find, too bad they don’t use “natural born”


147 posted on 04/09/2011 2:53:35 PM PDT by patlin (Reagan was a Democrat before he was a Republican: "I didn't leave the Democrat Party, they left me")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]

To: bushpilot1
This doesn’t wash as those children were born either prior to or during the revolutionary period while under the Articles of Confederation. They were born prior to the US Constitution, therefore, those children would have fallen under the grandfather clause because at the time of the adoption of the US Constitution, they were already citizens. “Natural born” only pertains to children born after Sept 27, 1789.
151 posted on 04/10/2011 8:04:11 AM PDT by patlin (Reagan was a Democrat before he was a Republican: "I didn't leave the Democrat Party, they left me")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson