Is Barack Obama actually not in this photo of Barack Obama?

Salon ^ | 4/7/2001 | Alex Pareene

[Kleon]

Jack Cashill, the right-wing journalist currently winning the national game of "'prove' the most outlandish thing you possibly can about Barack Obama" with his both his theory that Bill Ayers ghost-wrote "Dream From My Father" and his claim that the president's father was actually Jimi Hendrix, dropped a bombshell today: Barack Obama is not actually in a photo of Barack Obama and his grandparents.

[bgill]

Forgot to mention that Stanley has two left hands. Look very closely at Madelyn’s left elbow. You can see his finger tips. Someone forgot to erase the fingers when they added Obama.

[Ditter]

Thanks.

[this is my country]

A photo that has been chiopped up & editted with photo shop to support a theory that it is fake without evidence an underlying one exists is not going to remove the usurper.

A photo that was furnished by the Obama Campaign to the Time magazine?

http://www.time.com/time/photogallery/0,29307,1834628_1754223,00.html

There is a question of fraud, identity theft and impersonation. In addition to the eligibility issue, there are possible crimes that have been committed. The President is not above the law, even if he thinks he can get around the constitution by stalling the birth certificate.

I understand what your saying, but remember they didn't get Al Capone for murder, they got him for taxes.

[Fred Nerks]

His first trip to Kenya was in 1983, shortly after the son-of-a-kenyan-goat-herder was killed:

http://allafrica.com/stories/200408160533.html

A Sunday Nation team that set out to trace Obama’s roots was surprised to find that, unknown to many, Obama has actually been to this village twice. First in 1983, when he had come to mourn his late father, Barack Hussein Obama, who had died in Nairobi in 1982; and again in 1995 when he brought home his young bride to show her his roots.”

THAT’S WHY HE’S WEARING THE SAME JACKET.

[Fred Nerks]

You would surely know by now...that zero was posed on that bench by himself and then INSERTED between an image of the Dunhams?

And in the process, the WALL WAS DESTROYED.

Here’s the link to the original sequence:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2458646/posts?page=144#144

[bgill]

Yes, I know.

[Girlene]

That's not a lot to go on.[the widow's peak]..at least Mark resembles his father - Agree on both points.

That difficulty only exists because the MYTH requires you to see the older, darker boy in the family group as MARK...where-as MARK is the younger, lighter child she is holding.

I don't see it. The darker child looks like Mark (although it IS a fairly blurry photo).

That's what I am trying to understand. There were three little boys. It seems the baby-sitter was telling the truth when she said she babysat for ANNA OBAMA when her own daughter was 18 months old. Her daughter was born in July 1959. That places the baby-sitting in JANUARY 1961. Stanley Ann Dunham would have been still in High School when THAT child was conceived.

Yes, I've seen that, but how does this add up with SAD showing up with a baby that her friend in Washington remembers in August, 1961?

Are you saying there were two mothers in Washington, or that the friend she visited in August was wrong about that memory?......or something else?